Re: stdcxx-13 - Windows configration

2005-08-25 Thread Alex Ostapenko
Hello, Martin! You wrote to stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org on Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:52:00 +0400: MS [...] ?? No, this file can not be generated. It is an origin where ?? compiler/linker/librarian options are being taken from. May be it was ?? just a wrong analogy with .config files (I have got

Re: stdcxx-13 - Windows configration (was: Re: [Fwd: notes on the stdcxx configuration process])

2005-08-24 Thread Alex Ostapenko
Hello, Martin! You wrote to stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org on Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:31:39 +0400: MS Which file is vc_conf.js supposed to be the equivalent of? If it's MS one of the .config files (such as gcc.config) then I don't think MS the file is necessary at this stage unless it's

Re: stdcxx-13 - Windows configration

2005-08-24 Thread Martin Sebor
Alex Ostapenko wrote: [...] ?? I am not sure that Visual Studio terminology is applicable here. ?? Visual Studio does not allow adding, removing or changing compilers ?? without writing special Visual Studio extensions. MS That's where the other script to generate the VS Solution will come MS

Re: stdcxx-13 - Windows configration

2005-08-23 Thread Martin Sebor
Alex Ostapenko wrote: Hello, Martin! You wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:50:36 -0600: ?? We need to build on following platforms/configurations: ?? - Windows 2000/XP/2003 32-bit with MSVC 6, 7.0, 7.1 and future 8.0 ?? compiler - Windows 2000/XP/2003 32-bit with Intel ICC