Re: stdcxx-13 - Windows configration (was: Re: [Fwd: notes on the stdcxx configuration process])

2005-08-24 Thread Alex Ostapenko
Hello, Martin! You wrote to stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org on Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:31:39 +0400: MS Which file is vc_conf.js supposed to be the equivalent of? If it's MS one of the .config files (such as gcc.config) then I don't think MS the file is necessary at this stage unless it's

FW: [PATCH] STDCXX-11: IA64 32-bit atomic operations broken

2005-08-24 Thread Nicole Willson
Here is the patch for atomic-ia64-32.s: Start of src/atomic-ia64-32.s --- // // atomic-ia64-32.s // // $Id:

Re: stdcxx-13 - Windows configration

2005-08-24 Thread Martin Sebor
Alex Ostapenko wrote: [...] ?? I am not sure that Visual Studio terminology is applicable here. ?? Visual Studio does not allow adding, removing or changing compilers ?? without writing special Visual Studio extensions. MS That's where the other script to generate the VS Solution will come MS