I have not found any test for the find_end algorithm. It is declared in
25.find.cpp but there is no exercise for it anywhere.
So I implemented this test. It is in the attached file.
With best wishes,
Anton Pevtsov
/***
*
Martin Sebor wrote:
John Benito wrote:
Martin,
Just to let you know, while trying the 11s build on Solaris 5.10 using
EDG 3.5 over GCC 3.4.3 I am getting the following diagnostics. Will
look into away to include uint64_t this afternoon, unless you have
already seen this.
[...]
The error
[EDG eccp/Solaris 10] error compiling assert.cpp
Key: STDCXX-81
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-81
Project: STDCXX
Type: Bug
Components: Build
Versions: 4.1.2
Environment: EDG eccp 3.5,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-73?page=all ]
Martin Sebor resolved STDCXX-73:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with the committed changes.
[MSVC 8] std::type_info declared in the wrong namespace
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-76?page=all ]
Martin Sebor resolved STDCXX-76:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with the committed change.
[MSVC 8.0] std::uncaught_exception() always true
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-65?page=all ]
Martin Sebor resolved STDCXX-65:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with the committed change.
std::numeric_limitsint::traps = false when integer arithmetic traps
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-65?page=comments#action_12359201 ]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-65:
The test support/18.limits.traps.cpp exercises this behavior:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-72?page=all ]
Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-72:
--
Assign To: Martin Sebor
[25.adjacent.find.cpp] predicate form of std::adjacent_find not exercised
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-72?page=comments#action_12359202 ]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-72:
The commit above is an improvement but quoting from
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stdcxx-dev/200512.mbox/[EMAIL
