The cause of the different issues is the the different versions of the
Intel C++ 9.0 compiler.
I have
Intel(R) C++ Compiler for 32-bit applications, Version 9.0Build
20051020Z Package ID: W_CC_C_9.0.019
W_CC_C_9.0.019 compiler version has no problem with spaces in defines:
/D
Anton Pevtsov wrote:
[...]
I found that there are several strange things with ICC Compiler
integrated into Visual Studio:
[...]
2. The ICC solutiion uses .icproj files for projects but requires
corresponding .vcproj files too. It looks like it is impossible to open
the solution without .vcproj
Anton Pevtsov wrote:
[...]
Martin Sebor wrote:
Also, if we are still copying the .dll to the example and test
directories as I noticed the script was some time back I would like to
change this to make sure no such copying takes place. Instead we
should modify the PATH variable or do
Martin,
Could you please take a look at this patch and let me know if it meets
your approval?
I have removed the all target, replaced it with a lib, which being first
in the makefile is picked when building w/ no goals and configures and
builds the library (no examples and/or tests which I
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin,
Could you please take a look at this patch and let me know if it meets
your approval?
Will do.
But first a few things about the process :)
1. The subject line of a patch should start with the string [PATCH]
to make it easily distinguishable from other posts.
2.
Martin Sebor wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
But first a few things about the process :)
Will follow.
That looks okay. I'm just not too excited about the duplication
if the code between lib and .DEFAULT. Is there an easy way to
avoid it?
Not excited about that either. I spent some time
I think we had those at some point in the past. IIRC, I took them out
because I thought it was cleaner to have them in the individual (sub)
makefiles instead. I.e., the top level makefile shouldn't need to know
all the dependencies of each subcomponent. It easy to miss some (such
as the dependency
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
I think we had those at some point in the past. IIRC, I took them out
because I thought it was cleaner to have them in the individual (sub)
makefiles instead. I.e., the top level makefile shouldn't need to know
all the dependencies of each subcomponent. It easy to miss some
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Liviu Nicoara wrote:
I think we had those at some point in the past. IIRC, I took them out
because I thought it was cleaner to have them in the individual (sub)
makefiles instead. I.e., the top level makefile shouldn't need to know
all the
Addressing:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-85
ChangeLog entry:
2005-12-15 Liviu Nicoara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* GNUMakefile: removed useless rules: all, builddir, added
rule lib, added variable INCDIR
* etc/config/GNUmakefile.lib: invoked make config when
10 matches
Mail list logo
