On 7/5/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our mentors as well as a number of IPMC members recently expressed
confidence in stdcxx being ready to graduate out of the incubator
(see the thread starting with msg14476 below).
In order to propose graduation to the Incubator PMC we all need to
Hi,
I thought it was just me going mad, but a quick glance at
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/solaris-10-amd64-sunpro-64b-5.8-12S-solaris-553686-log.gz.txt
confirms that I'm right.
After configuring as: gmake builddir
BUILDMODE=threads,archive,optimized,wide CONFIG=sunpro.config
Hi Martin,
On 7/7/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I recall reading somewhere that Sun C++ 5.9 supports the gcc -m64
option but I can't find the reference. Do you happen to have a link?
The x86 equivalent I was able to find in the online documentation is
still -xarch=amd64 (I
Hi Martin,
On 7/9/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the list and Jira in case we figure out before you do
(otherwise keep us posted -- thanks!)
Thanks - I'll definitely keep an eye on the lists.
Michael
Hi Martin,
On 7/8/07, Michael van der Westhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've logged a compile-time showstopper (a ube assertion that crops up
in both 4.1.3 and 4.2.0) with bugs.sun.com
[snip]
The bug available online here:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6579425
Michael
Hi Martin,
On 8/23/07, Martin Sebor (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
A recent project at work reminded me that it would be useful to keep track of
LOC counts and other metrics for stdcxx on an ongoing basis and publish the
data (perhaps in a graphical form) on the project web site. One
HI,
On 9/19/07, Martin Sebor (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-275:
-
Grrr. aCC 3.74 spits out the option with the complaint below (and then
asserts on the code):
The -hpxstd98 (a.k.a the EDG frontend) is only available
On 10/3/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
[snip]
It occurs to me that we might be able to preempt a potentially
contentious discussion by replacing the stdcxx Acknowledgment
page with one describing the pre-stdcxx history of the project
where we could retain any or