.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
,
and note any increase in re-allocated sectors, etc.
Below is some sample output from 'smartctl' from my home system.
Bets Regards
Nigel Smith
# ./smartctl -d sat,12 -i /dev/rdsk/c4t5d0
smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [i386-pc-solaris2.11] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http
?
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
Now that the 'Flag Days' page is up and running again,
we can see the 'Heads Up' email regarding the putback
of the cpqary3 driver:
http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20091230160245.html
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
/pmcs8001fw
file0555 usr/lib/mdb/kvm/amd64/pmcs.so
file0555 usr/lib/mdb/kvm/pmcs.so
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
size disk that the cmdk driver will recognise is 1TB.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
.
At this stage I'm thinking it may be easier to get
Sun/Oracle to fix the aac driver, than to get Adaptec
to fix their own driver. But I may be wrong.
BTW, what was your reason for choosing the Adaptec card?
Best regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
AND firmware revision?
This is often reported by 'cfgadm -v'.
Have you tried with a new/replacement drive yet?
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
?a=view
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
Similar problem reported here:
sil3726 + ich10 port multiplier problem
Posted: Nov 19, 2009 11:08 AM
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=436543
..but no fix.
Regards
Nigel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
around the
hard drives, does the problem move with the hard drive,
or stay on the same port?
Have you tried swapping the SATA cables around to see
if the problem moves?
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss
are using raidz2, you could try taking the problem disk offline:
# zpool offline data c6t1d0
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
,
that had recently been retired from running Windows.
The cpqary3 loaded automatically, as expected, with the results,
shown below. I've not got time to go any further for now.
But it looks good so far.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
# cat /etc/release
OpenSolaris Development snv_132
target afew months ago.
I'm not sure how to resolve this, so I can successfully boot into snv_128a.
Maybe if I could remove the FCoE packages, it would not try to call these
routines.
Any ideas /or advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
=0x0
Maybe if I delete the FCOE target port on the e1000 card,
it will allow snv_128 to boot.
I will try that tomorrow, after I get some sleep.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss
group. And then repeat the discovery
of the target from the initiator...
For the target alias and targetchapuser, you can explicitly remove
any value, by passing parameter 'none'.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage
wants to take a look, the source code is available here:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/itadm/itadm.c
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss
would not claim to be a CHAP expert, but as I understand it,
the targetchapsecret is used for bidirectional chap.
So if you wanted to revert to unidirectional chap, then you
would want the ability to unset the targetchapsecret.
Best regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
from
those PCI IDs to a description of the cards:
http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/IXGBE.html
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
.html
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
will be in snv_128.
So I guess this could maybe make a different in your scenario...
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
Hi Lars
You can see the changes to the nv_sata drivers here:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/history/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/sata/adapters/nv_sata/nv_sata.c
The latest fix is this:
6746831 nv_sata: SGPIO LED code should use a more reliable method to
determine whether a
Wireshark should be able to open display the capture files.
It can deal with most formats, including snoop, automatically.
BTW, Wireshark is now in openSolaris since snv_114,
as package SUNWwireshark, although maybe not the latest version.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from
may see this fix available?
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
on, and progress is being made.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
, as both
gPXE and comstar versions you are using are still under
development.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
.
This thread reports a similar problem:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=259993
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2008-October/022302.html
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
.
Ok, over to Sun's iscsi experts to pass judgement on the above!
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
/storage-discuss/2009-September/007192.html
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
, released
yesterday:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2009-October/001280.html
...or grab an ISO from here:
http://www.genunix.org/
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing
Hi Rafael
I wrote up some notes on setting up a basic
comstar iscsi target, available here:
http://nwsmith.blogspot.com/2009/07/opensolaris-2009-06-and-comstar-iscsi.html
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage
/10509
..so as the putpack was before the 'onnv_124' tag,
I would say that the fix should be in onnv_124.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
, I will have to try out the
the OpenSolaris FCoE initiator.
I see from your post here:
http://www.open-fcoe.org/pipermail/devel/2009-September/004094.html
..that I can be optimistic of getting it working.
Best regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
for OpenSolaris 2009/06 in snv_122.
My main aim at this stage is just to learn more
about the Fibre Channel protocol, as so far I've
only worked with the iScsi protocol.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage
booting from an OpenSolaris 2009/06 Live CD
and use the 'Device Driver Utility' to check if the
driver loads.
You could also use 'scanpci' to confirm the PCI vendor device numbers,
so we know exactly what you have.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
which packages were actually installed.
# pkginfo | grep -i fcoe
system SUNWfcoeu Sun FCoE Port Management Library
So I am missing 'SUNWfcoe' and 'SUNWfcoet', which explains the problem!
Sorry about that!
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Ok, let's see if we can get this working:
# pkg install SUNWfcoe
# pkg install SUNWfcoet
# pkginfo | grep fcoe
system SUNWfcoeSun FCoE Transport Driver
system SUNWfcoet Sun FCoE COMSTAR Driver
system SUNWfcoeu Sun
+to+Configure+FCoE+Ports
Please can the FCoE expert advise me what's going wrong here and how to proceed.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
# ifconfig e1000g1 unplumb
# dladm show-ether
LINKPTYPESTATEAUTO SPEED-DUPLEXPAUSE
rge0current up no1G-f
back on the second set of capture files
later...
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
on your OpenSolaris server?
Just a guess, but may be worth eliminating this as a possible cause.
It may be worth trying disabling I/OAT in the BIOS if possible.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
a related problem?
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
Hi Roman
If the quick-format fails quickly, can you capture the Ethernet
packets for the iscsi (tcp port 3260), and I will take a
look at it for you.
BTW, which version of opensolaris are you running now?
Regards
Nigel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
.
It would be excellent to see the Comstar iscsi target being able to
use this approach.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
- SATA Framework Port Multiplier Support
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/394/spec.txt
Support appears to be for Silicon Image's SiI3726 and SiI4726 with 5 ports
and the SiI4723 with 2 ports.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Putback has been done for:
6867945 iscsit does not handle pminsize properly in iscsit_dbuf_alloc
http://hg.genunix.org/onnv-gate.hg/rev/111393108d23
Presumably this will be in snv_122:
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Your not giving much background information in your posts.
What variety of Linux, which version? (Fedora 11, Centos 5.3,...)
What configuration settings have you made on the initiator?
What error message are you getting?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
As far as I can see, this nomination and subsequent votes
have not posted through to the mail archive:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/storage-discuss/2009-August/date.html
..so maybe some of the other core contributors
did not see the nomination.
Thanks
Nigel
--
This message posted
Hi Tom
Yes, I realised shortly after I posted, that I
should have mentioned which nomination I
was talking about...
And, no it's not the one for Dan Maslowski,
but this one:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=109941
Charles Baker wrote
I would like to introduce and nominate
://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=214
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/cifs-discuss/
I have a few links on how to use it, here:
http://delicious.com/nwsmith/opensolaris-nas
Good luck!
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
the system working with normal
~1500 byte packets, then you can try jumbo frames.
But you will need to allocate an increased size
for buffers to handle this.
Please report back to the forum how you progress
with this - success or further issues that
need investigating.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
the Windows
and Solaris machines, which may be affecting things.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
I've attached a screen-shot of the strange 'large' packet
as reported by WireShark, captured on the Windows Server.
Thanks
Nigel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.orgattachment: Large packet.gif___
storage-discuss mailing list
to the
stack, or a bug in wireshark?
I think it could be something like that.
We needs some further data to try to figure...
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
Yes, that must be it!
Described well here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_segment_offload
So WinPcap, must be intercepting BEFORE the NIC driver
breaks it down into the normal small packets.
Many thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
size.
And if you could capture an initial iscsi login,
(say the first hundred packets from the TCP SYN packet)
we could see what iscsi parameters are being negotiated.
The value of those parameters could affect performance.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
following a 'scsi Read(16)'.
In WireShark, try 'Statistics TCP Stream graph Time-sequence graph
(Stevens)'
Out of spare time for now...
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss
to be an expert on this, and I'm just trying to
spot the facts and draw the conclusions.
So hopefully someone who is an expert can enlighten us all.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
tcp timestamps
and window size scaling.
I've asked Thomas if he would consent to making these capture files
publicly available from my web site, so other can take a look
and give an opinion.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
/linux.iperf.cap
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
uploads/transmits data from the client to the server.)
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
/tcp tcp_naglim_def
4095
# ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_naglim_def 1
# ndd -get /dev/tcp tcp_naglim_def
1
I'm not sure how you control nagle on Linux, so ask Google.
If that does not work, maybe some of the other tcp
tunable values will affect things:
# ndd /dev/tcp \?
Best Regards
Nigel
will
have a look at them and try to see what the differences are.
Many thanks for your assistance with this.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
I would like to introduce and nominate Dan Maslowski
to be a Storage Core Contributor.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
I would like to introduce and nominate Grant Zhang to
be a Storage Core Contributor.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
, so we can grab it.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
get the inconsistency that you
are experiencing.
You would need to use something like the Veritas cluster file system,
or Vmware's VMFS.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss
First, just confirm what packages are installed.
Try this:
# pkginfo | egrep -i 'iscsi|comstar|stmf'
..and post back output to this forum.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage
Zhong Wang wrote:
I'd like to introduce and nominate Larry Liu to be a Storage Community
Core Contributor.
+1
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
-and-comstar-iscsi.html
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
Charles Baker wrote:
I would like to introduce and nominate Jim Dunham to be a Storage Core
Contributor.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Charles Baker wrote:
I would like to introduce and nominate Scott Tracy to be a Storage Core
Contributor.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Charles Baker wrote:
I would like to introduce and nominate Peter Dunlap to be a Storage Core
Contributor.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Maybe I should have explicitly put in my vote:
+1
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
been suggested earlier.
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
!
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
# ./zfs-test.sc
+ zpool destroy test-raidz
+ zpool create test-raidz raidz1 /vdev/disk1 /vdev/disk2 /vdev/disk3
+ zfs create test-raidz/data
+ cp -pr /usr/perl5/ /test-raidz/data
+ cp -pr /usr/sfw/ /test-raidz/data
+ cp -pr /usr/share/lib/ /test-raidz/data
+ cp -pr /usr
-forum:
http://opensolaris.markmail.org/search/?q=from%3A%22Mike+La+Spina%22
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
links from NetApp that make a case:
http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2006/05/why_double_prot.html
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/fast04/tech/corbett/corbett.pdf
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
?
Thanks
Nigel Smith
# mkfile 128m /vdev/disk1
# mkfile 128m /vdev/disk2
# mkfile 128m /vdev/disk3
# zpool create test-raidz raidz1 /vdev/disk1 /vdev/disk2 /vdev/disk3
# zpool status test-raidz
pool: test-raidz
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE
I support this nomination:
+1
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
..
(and lacking in expertise..!)
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
I vote +1 to renew Chuck's core contributer status.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
My grant also expires at the same time as Cyril.
And I also would like to renew my core contributor status.
If it's easier to get the voting done sooner rather
than latter, then that is ok with me.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I vote +1 to renew Tom's core contributer status.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
I vote +1 to renew Aaron's core contributer status.
+1
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
.
If anyone else reading this is using snv-107 then please
try setting up a tpgt and see if it works for you...
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Oh, Ok.
I'm not a DTrace expert, but maybe that means
that the '*initiator_name' being passed into that
function in NULL.
In which case that implies to me that the Initiator
name is being 'lost' in the code somewhere for
some unknown reason...
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from
in their Login packet, so that
'InitiatorName' comes before 'TargetName'.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage
Sorry, but there is an error in the above post
So this line is wrong:
# iscsitadm modify tpgt -i 172.16.8.196
It needs to be:
# iscsitadm modify tpgt -i 172.16.8.196 20
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage
.
(I cannot paste this XML directly into here, as the 'Jive'
forum software will not display it correctly.)
Just confirm that looks correct.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
TPGT.xml
Description: Binary data
___
storage
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
looked at the ones in line 107 and 141,
but I've noticed there is a third one in line 161.
I wonder if that one be causing a problem?
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
this confusion over truncated TargetNames.
Maybe this need a bug/RFE entering in the database..
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
/wiki/index.php/DTrace_Topics_iSCSI
This DTrace script will list various iscsi target 'events'
as they happen. You can see an example of the output from here:
http://markmail.org/message/y5uy3s43ixy76qda
Many thanks
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
there also seem a low number of Key/Value pairs
during the login.)
Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
on the other thread just after
this point. But I don't know enough about how DTrace works to
know if this could be an issue.
Best Regards
Nigel Smith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
