Dear Erin,
Thank you for the links provided. I've downloaded the documents and look
forward to reading them.
I can certainly appreciate the sensitivities surrounding the desire to
address what is a pervasive and extremely complex problem, though attempts
to do so often restrict appropriate
Dear Samer
It is my hope that Cecil Cook will wander through here one day because we
spent a great deal of time looking into these problems
In particular I will be keen to explore more deeply the ramifications for
testing, actual fuel use, and the memes that relate these to problems of
Crispin and list
1. Since we are a few days away from the ETHOS meeting, and there will be
some funders there, I hope you can elaborate on this phrase from below:
“…. the major pathologies have been excised …”
2. We have discoursed on your not measuring char production in the
Doug,
would your design objective make it feasible to make that cutter foot
operated with a return spring?
Closest thing I can find with a short search is a foot operated grommet
press. http://navyaviation.tpub.com/14218/css/14218_230.htm
Jason
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Doug
Dear Jason
A common enough machine with the right blade support is a sheet metal
treadle operate notcher. This machine is normally manually operated even in
large workshops.
Here is one
From http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=treadle+notcher+sheet+metal
Dear all,
First, I will thank Michael for his reply.
Second, I will exclaim my shock that NOBODY ELSE made any reply. What
does that tell us?
Silence means consent. That would mean that you all agree with me,
and with Crispin. Sir Thomas Moore used that argument, and then they
chopped
Crispin, I take the liberty of responding to the whole list since 1) you
didn’t ask me not to, 2) you wished you had on the last similar message to me,
3) because the stove list likely mostly wants to hear, and 4) because we both
think the topics are important.
I have added your and my
