DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10432.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I included a noCookies-Attribute in the LinkTag Class, so i can switch
between Cookie-enabled Session-Tracking and url encoded session tracking.
So i can do:
html:link page='/myAction.do' noCookies='true'Click here/html:link
and get
http://myserver/myapp/myAction.do;jsessionid=XYZMYSESSION as
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7202.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10322.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10322.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks Joe. The little problem I'm having is that there isn't really a way to
initialize the reference to the value object. In other words, how to get the property
to reference the value object fetched by the Action. It's no big deal. Now that I
realize that it's not part of the philsophy of
Hi,
Supose you have a Tiles component definition composed (a) by two JSP pages.
There's a struts form in a page that maps to an action defined in struts.xml
file. This action defines several forwards that map to other Tiles component
definitions.
Now supose that you want reuse the same form in
Andres,
These questions are best directed to the Struts Users
mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Andres Angelani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Supose you have a Tiles component definition
composed (a) by two JSP pages.
There's
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Jens Viebig wrote:
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:50:52 +0200
From: Jens Viebig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LinkTag Extension to url encode SessionId
I included a
Adds my book, which includes a chapter on Struts.
James
Index: books.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-struts/doc/resources/books.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -r1.2 books.xml
25a26
pa
Can you submit this to Bugzilla using cvs diff -u.
This way we can track it take care of it.
Thanks,
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adds my book, which includes a chapter on Struts.
James Index: books.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10451.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-03 22:10 ---
Maybe, I should take a look at the patch =:0). What I had in mind wouldn't
bypass the controller. It would look up the path specified by the
ActionForward
and use that for the action= path. This wouldn't be any
It would be an either/or option, like the page= and forward= attributes
html:link. Which syntax to use can be decided on a case-by-case basis,
or a team might decide to always use one or the other.
In the case of a html:form tag using the forward= attribute, where it
submitted would depend on
At 6:39 PM -0400 2002/07/03, Hal Deadman wrote:
Does using the forward attribute mean creating a global forward for every
action submitted to by a form? If so you end up with lots of global-forwards
that map directly to actions, so why not just use the action URL?
This seems like just one more
craigmcc2002/07/03 17:05:48
Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd
src/share/org/apache/struts/config ControllerConfig.java
ForwardConfig.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Hal Deadman wrote:
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:39:13 -0400
From: Hal Deadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7202] - Add
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Security issues with Struts
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Marcel Kruzel wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:14:05 +0200
From:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7202.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
IMHO, Struts already provides a solid framework for developing
thread-safe, secure web apps. At the end of the day, developers need to
understand and adhere to basic security and concurrency best practices.
I can, however, offer one idea that is essentially an extension to the
J2EE spec:
22 matches
Mail list logo