DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Best site on collections and threads:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/
by Doug Lea
.V
David Graham wrote:
Maybe I'm displaying gross ignorance here but AFAIK a synchronized block
grabs the object's monitor and blocks other threads from calling
*synchronized* methods on that
I used bean:message with my browser locale de_AT sent, and dvelving
into struts source-code inside ...struts.util.PropertyMessageResource I
found that it does´nt strip of the locales correctly - my
key=labels.xxx.xxx, enhanced firstly with de_AT.labels.xxx.xxx,
transformed incorrcetly to
I've read his book - good one.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of V. Cekvenich
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:21 AM
Best site on collections and threads:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/
by Doug Lea
.V
--
To unsubscribe,
Thanks for the explanation Craig. That's what I meant when I said that
unsynchronized methods can be called regardless of synchronized method
calls. And of course you can't fully tell if a class is thread safe by the
existence of synch. methods. I was concerned when I saw unsynch. access to
,although Java makes threading relatively easy...
pun type=bad
I find Java gives you more than enough thread to hang yourself with ;-
/pun
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Synchronized
Object Oriented Programmer Syndrome, aka OOPS.
I forgot to say this is up on the web and you can play (not abuse
please, it is my pipe/bandwidth) at:
http://soap2k.appsaspeers.com:8080/struts-example/
Logon and enter your registration info and then go back to Edit
Registration and change the
Ok last question I promise. I have been going through the code and I see where almost
everything is being done. The only thing I still am having trouble with is if the
Digester loads the ActionMapping objects and the RequestProcessor loads the Action
objects, how does the Action object get at
-Original Message-
From: Travis Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok last question I promise. I have been going through the
code and I see where almost everything is being done. The
only thing I still am having trouble with is if the Digester
loads the ActionMapping objects and
A Thank you. I am such a moron. I see the tie now. I just looked at
the DTD again right as your mail cam in. I see where you can specify and
ActionMapping subclass on the action element that would have to have these properties.
Thank you all very much for your patience.
-Original Message-
From: Travis Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
A Thank you. I am such a moron.
No, you're not; it's not a very well-named element and causes lots of people
lots of problems. The good (or bad!) news is you'll probably now edit your
struts-config.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12473.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The JavaWorld article is indeed pretty good, except for the predating of
the XHMTL tag in the struts-html tag library.
Also it seems to me that the meat of the servlet they use in their
example code could be encapsulated in a single custom tag that inserted
the xml in the output.
So if you take
craigmcc2003/01/28 11:30:24
Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd
doc/userGuide configuration.xml
src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java
RequestProcessor.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/config
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16337.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16514.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16517.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rleland 2003/01/28 21:35:25
Modified:web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml
Log:
Bug 16517 Reported by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually it isn't clear but the commented out XML wasn't supposed to
be closed by a /form-bean it was ment to be an optional
part of the starting tag, but
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16517.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
Hey folks, if we're going to go for the Valentine's Day Release
Massacre, we need to get the last 5 bugs closed. Any progress to report
by anyone?
Dear Mr. Validator,
Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and #16337 may be a
problem
Struts has now joined the (rather small) list of Jakarta projects which
have *zero* bad imports (i.e. unused or unnecessary) in their code base:
http://cvs.apache.org/~tcopeland/jakarta_bad_imports.htm
Cool!
--
Martin Cooper
Dear Mr. Validator,
Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and
#16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration.
Any progress to report?
;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Whoops, they weren't showing up on my bug query, I'll jump right on 'em.
Boy, I get called Mr.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
Dear Mr. Validator,
Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and
#16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration.
Any progress to report?
;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Whoops, they weren't showing up on my bug query,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16530.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
28 matches
Mail list logo