DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16489] New: - minlength and maxlength js validator with password fields

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16489] - minlength and maxlength js validator with password fields

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16491] New: - Transform minlength validator to minlengthorempty

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16491] - Transform minlength validator to minlengthorempty

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16491. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-28 Thread V. Cekvenich
Best site on collections and threads: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/ by Doug Lea .V David Graham wrote: Maybe I'm displaying gross ignorance here but AFAIK a synchronized block grabs the object's monitor and blocks other threads from calling *synchronized* methods on that

bean:message backups to default message ressource with error

2003-01-28 Thread Jörg Maurer
I used bean:message with my browser locale de_AT sent, and dvelving into struts source-code inside ...struts.util.PropertyMessageResource I found that it does´nt strip of the locales correctly - my key=labels.xxx.xxx, enhanced firstly with de_AT.labels.xxx.xxx, transformed incorrcetly to

RE: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-28 Thread Mark Galbreath
I've read his book - good one. Mark -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of V. Cekvenich Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:21 AM Best site on collections and threads: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/ by Doug Lea .V -- To unsubscribe,

Re: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-28 Thread David Graham
Thanks for the explanation Craig. That's what I meant when I said that unsynchronized methods can be called regardless of synchronized method calls. And of course you can't fully tell if a class is thread safe by the existence of synch. methods. I was concerned when I saw unsynch. access to

RE: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-28 Thread Andrew Hill
,although Java makes threading relatively easy... pun type=bad I find Java gives you more than enough thread to hang yourself with ;- /pun -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Synchronized

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS]Generating XML from Struts JSP

2003-01-28 Thread Mike Oliver
Object Oriented Programmer Syndrome, aka OOPS. I forgot to say this is up on the web and you can play (not abuse please, it is my pipe/bandwidth) at: http://soap2k.appsaspeers.com:8080/struts-example/ Logon and enter your registration info and then go back to Edit Registration and change the

RE: Action question

2003-01-28 Thread Travis Chase
Ok last question I promise. I have been going through the code and I see where almost everything is being done. The only thing I still am having trouble with is if the Digester loads the ActionMapping objects and the RequestProcessor loads the Action objects, how does the Action object get at

RE: Action question

2003-01-28 Thread Nelson, Laird
-Original Message- From: Travis Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Ok last question I promise. I have been going through the code and I see where almost everything is being done. The only thing I still am having trouble with is if the Digester loads the ActionMapping objects and

RE: Action question

2003-01-28 Thread Travis Chase
A Thank you. I am such a moron. I see the tie now. I just looked at the DTD again right as your mail cam in. I see where you can specify and ActionMapping subclass on the action element that would have to have these properties. Thank you all very much for your patience.

RE: Action question

2003-01-28 Thread Nelson, Laird
-Original Message- From: Travis Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] A Thank you. I am such a moron. No, you're not; it's not a very well-named element and causes lots of people lots of problems. The good (or bad!) news is you'll probably now edit your struts-config.xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16489] - minlength and maxlength js validator with password fields

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12473. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS]Generating XML from Struts JSP

2003-01-28 Thread Mike Oliver
The JavaWorld article is indeed pretty good, except for the predating of the XHMTL tag in the struts-html tag library. Also it seems to me that the meat of the servlet they use in their example code could be encapsulated in a single custom tag that inserted the xml in the output. So if you take

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config ControllerConfig.java

2003-01-28 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc2003/01/28 11:30:24 Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd doc/userGuide configuration.xml src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java RequestProcessor.java src/share/org/apache/struts/config

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16337] - Using the validator and DynaValidatorForm does not work with multi page

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16337. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16514] New: - Nested tiles fail in this release

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16517] New: - Example comment for form-bean in struts-config.xml in struts-blank application missing closing tag

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml

2003-01-28 Thread rleland
rleland 2003/01/28 21:35:25 Modified:web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml Log: Bug 16517 Reported by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually it isn't clear but the commented out XML wasn't supposed to be closed by a /form-bean it was ment to be an optional part of the starting tag, but

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16517] - Example comment for form-bean in struts-config.xml in struts-blank application missing closing tag

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Cracking the whip

2003-01-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote: Hey folks, if we're going to go for the Valentine's Day Release Massacre, we need to get the last 5 bugs closed. Any progress to report by anyone? Dear Mr. Validator, Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and #16337 may be a problem

Struts joins the zero bad imports list

2003-01-28 Thread Martin Cooper
Struts has now joined the (rather small) list of Jakarta projects which have *zero* bad imports (i.e. unused or unnecessary) in their code base: http://cvs.apache.org/~tcopeland/jakarta_bad_imports.htm Cool! -- Martin Cooper

RE: Cracking the whip

2003-01-28 Thread James Turner
Dear Mr. Validator, Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and #16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration. Any progress to report? ;-) -- Martin Cooper Whoops, they weren't showing up on my bug query, I'll jump right on 'em. Boy, I get called Mr.

RE: Cracking the whip

2003-01-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote: Dear Mr. Validator, Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and #16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration. Any progress to report? ;-) -- Martin Cooper Whoops, they weren't showing up on my bug query,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16530] New: - html:base gets funky value running in mod_jk

2003-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16530. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.