JSTL EL Validator rule: A better requiredif and validatewhen using JSTL

I am new to this list so I apologize if I break any etiquette. I was thinking that I don't like validatewhen or requiredif so I wrote my own that uses JSTL EL. (I like the idea behind requiredif and validatewhen just not the implementation.) I believe this approach has several advantages over

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22701] - commons-logging and SSL in tomcat with struts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22701. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22514] - Indexed properties are not validated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22514. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22706] New: - how to execute an initialization method before the first (web-)user interaction (e.g. to create singletons at the very beginning of struts operation)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: JSTL EL Validator rule: A better requiredif and validatewhen using JSTL

What were your thoughts on JSTL EL validator rule? You commented on BSF and OGNL, but not the JSTL EL validator rule, which I actually wrote. The others just seem like a good idea. Regarding: This is a General suggestion you have probably given many times yourself First off then if this is

Re: JSTL EL Validator rule: A better requiredif and validatewhenusing JSTL

Rick Hightower wrote: What were your thoughts on JSTL EL validator rule? You commented on BSF and OGNL, but not the JSTL EL validator rule, which I actually wrote. The others just seem like a good idea. Sorry, For not commenting on that. I agree that a JSTL EL expression makes sense. For now

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html NestedCheckboxTag.html NestedErrorsTag.html NestedFileTag.html NestedFormTag.html NestedHiddenTag.html NestedImageTag.html NestedImgTag.html NestedLinkTag.html NestedMessagesTag.html NestedMultiboxTag.html NestedOptionsCollectionTag.html NestedOptionsTag.html NestedPasswordTag.html NestedRadioTag.html NestedSelectTag.html NestedSubmitTag.html NestedTextTag.html NestedTextareaTag.html package-frame.html package-summary.html package-tree.html package-use.html

rleland 2003/08/26 05:57:45 Added: legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean/class-use CookieTag.html CookieTei.html DefineTag.html DefineTei.html HeaderTag.html HeaderTei.html IncludeTag.html IncludeTei.html

RE: JSTL EL Validator rule: A better requiredif and validatewhen using JSTL

I am using the JSTL EL Validator that I wrote, but not the BSF or OGNL ones I suggested. I just think they would be a good idea. I'll try the BSF tag since I don't know much about OGNL. I like the idea of using the same JavaScript on the client side and the server side, but for now it is

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/logic/class-use NestedEmptyTag.html NestedEqualTag.html NestedGreaterEqualTag.html NestedGreaterThanTag.html NestedIterateTag.html NestedIterateTei.html NestedLessEqualTag.html NestedLessThanTag.html NestedMatchTag.html NestedMessagesNotPresentTag.html NestedMessagesPresentTag.html NestedNotEmptyTag.html NestedNotEqualTag.html NestedNotMatchTag.html NestedNotPresentTag.html NestedPresentTag.html

rleland 2003/08/26 06:10:08 Added: legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/bean/class-use NestedDefineTag.html NestedDefineTei.html NestedMessageTag.html NestedSizeTag.html NestedWriteTag.html

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/logic/doc-files nested-logic.gif

rleland 2003/08/26 06:14:09 Added: legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean/doc-files beanUML.gif legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/doc-files htmlUML.gif

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html/doc-files nested-html.gif

rleland 2003/08/26 06:15:13 Added: legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/logic/doc-files logicUML.gif legacy/api-1.1/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html/doc-files nested-html.gif Log: Add missing Struts 1.1 Java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22730] New: - Software caused connection abort: socket write error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22730. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22436] - validateFloat fails for 0.8 in the JavaScript

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22436. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: JSTL EL Validator rule: A better requiredif and validatewhen using JSTL

David Graham et al. I can feel the train derailing off the tracks. Screch! For a moment let's pretend that I never mentioned BSF or Rhino. I want to get your collective thoughts on JSTL EL Validator Rule. JSTL EL Validator Rule (validatejstl) -- What feedback do

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21972] - tiles:insert should pass flush attribute to JspWriter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21972. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17306] - extend field tag with forward attribute for error page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17306. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: JSTL EL Validator rule: A better requiredif and validatewhen using JSTL

Comments below... (**) David Graham: requiredif was released with 1.1, validwhen will be released with 1.2, I will -1 any other changes like this for 1.2 because we're too late in the cycle for something like this. ** Okay. No problem. I was merely stating that I give it a +1 (although my vote