We now have an XHTML 1.0 Strict compliant, CSS based tableless layout web
site with only one XSL stylesheet to worry about (plus the taglib) and no
need for a separate printer friendly version of the User Guide.
I've added a validation task to the build file to ensure that the generated
documents
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23052.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23052.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It does come up, especially when people are using frames. I usually
recommend that people use an Action to cache the messages in the session
during the redirect and then have another Action to move it back again
afterwards. It might be possible to engineer a standard Action to
automate this
I'm fine with all this generally, and was going to post the update, but
I'm having trouble getting it to transform. Several arbitrary files are
coming back
: Fatal Error! java.lang.NullPointerException Cause:
java.lang.NullPointerException
Failed to process
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23062.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David Graham wrote:
Contributors List
I think it's important to keep the contributors list on those pages
because it's a recognition of volunteers' effort. I agree that it gets in
the way so maybe the list should be at the bottom of the page in a smaller
+1, absolutely it's through those
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23052.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use Cases: I am not familar with the particular use cases where the
ActionMessage needs
to hang around in the session. So these suggestions might not fit.
The main reason I've seen on the user list (and the reason I need it) is
to redirect to a
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use Cases: I am not familar with the particular use cases where the
ActionMessage needs
to hang around in the session. So these suggestions might not fit.
The main reason I've seen on the user list (and the reason I need it)
What JDK are you running on? I did experience a similar intermittent problem
with Sun 1.4.2_01 (on W2K) but _02 runs with no problems.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 10, 2003 3:58 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: XHTML Web
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
This seems more responsive than a periodic cleanup and we wouldn't have to
cache HttpSession objects which may not be safe/legal. Also, I think
placing the cleanup in the RequestProcessor guarantees that it is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry, I'm getting my versions in a muddle. Here's the correct state:
Sun 1.4.2_01 - No problem
Sun 1.4.1_05 - Intermittent failures
Sun 1.4.1_02 - Intermittent failures
Sun 1.3.1- No problem
2 many twos and ones :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've installed Sun 1.4.2_01 but I'm still having trouble getting the
site to render.
I am in favor of rendering the site in valid XHTML, but we need it to
work with what people will commonly have installed. If the site can't be
rendered using the standard Java 1.2 or later advice, then I'll
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23069.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
husted 2003/09/10 16:12:30
Modified:doc/userGuide configuration.xml
Log:
+ Add xref to forwardPattern.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +6 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/configuration.xml
Index: configuration.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23020.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16609.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14404.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15921.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15805.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16272.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16272.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16585.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The look and feel you end up with should be almost identical to the existing
site.
I've uploaded a copy for comparison at http://www.ninsky.com/struts/site/
If the build is failing then the CSS file won't be copied over to the target
directory so that's why you don't see the formatting.
As to
Here's my attempt:
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo] - jakarta-struts 1.2-dev -
[echo] java.class.path =
C:\j2sdk1.4.1_02\lib\tools.jar;D:\home\jmitchell\apache_home\apache-ant-
1.5.3-1\lib\xml-apis.jar;D:\home\jmitchell\apache_home\apache-ant-1.5.3-
dgraham 2003/09/10 18:18:45
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionMessages.java
RequestProcessor.java Action.java
Log:
Added ability to save ActionMessages in the session and have
them cleaned up after the first use. This included adding
back
sraeburn2003/09/10 18:21:59
Modified:.build-webapps.xml
Log:
Reload stylesheets for XSL tranformations to avoid NPE bug.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +12 -6 jakarta-struts/build-webapps.xml
Index: build-webapps.xml
Thanks James, I'm about to commit an updated build-webbaps.xml file. It
seems to solve my problem on 1.4.1_02.
According to the Ant manual:
reloadstylesheet - Controls whether the stylesheet transformer is created
anew for every transform operation. If you set this to true, performance may
So we are consistent on the 'state' flag names like -used-
Bug 18022, talked about wrapping the ActionForm
with another class when it was returned from the createActionForm
method.
It would have two attributes: -recycled-, and ActionForm.
It would be nice if the terms -used-, and
Wow! This is odd.
After running the build in -debug, there weren't any good clues as to
the cause or where to start looking.
I began to open up the offending xml files one by one and copy over the
entire document with one that I knew had been transformed without issue.
Then re-ran the build.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:38:41 -0700
From: Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: XHTML Web site updates
The look and feel you end up with should
Ok, I just got a fresh copy (not an update) and it worked finesame
setup/jdk/ant/etc, new checkout.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist
http://www.struts-atlanta.org
678.910.8017
AIM:jmitchtx
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks, Craig. I hope that last patch will cure it for everyone regardless
of the JDK.
Steve
WORKSFORME on a just-downloaded CVS tree (19:40 Pacific Time), using JDK
1.4.2-b28 on Red Hat 9.0 Linux. The generated pages do indeed look very
much like the original style.
Craig
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22812.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16401.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dgraham 2003/09/10 21:27:21
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util
PropertyMessageResources.java
Log:
Changed constructor Initializing.. messages from info
to trace level for PR# 23062.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +10 -8
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23062.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I noticed you used log.trace() instead of log.debug(). Would it be better to
stick with debug for consistency?
Steve
-Original Message-
...
dgraham 2003/09/10 21:27:21
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util
PropertyMessageResources.java
Log:
It also works for me. From a CVS update.
I am using Xerces 2.5/Xalan 2.5
JDK 1.4.2_01
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, etc. in the
Struts code or any OS code for that matter?
My immediate response was, how can you
51 matches
Mail list logo