[PATCH] fixes a problem with extending forms

2001-12-14 Thread Udo Christ
When attaching derived forms we have had the prob of struts not agreeing on the class-name of the form due to checking with getClass().getName(). After changing to the following you can let forms extend the others but keep them under the same name within the request. Udo -- tw systems,

Re: form initialization

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
You really *MUST* post these questions to the user list where there are more people to help you. But, yes, you can write a Javascript that clears the fields. Anything you want to do client-side is going to involve Javascript, and is technically outside the scope of the framework. Colin

nesting beans not standard in Struts?

2001-12-14 Thread Sven Beauprez
hey guys, I am just wondering why MonkeyStruts isn't standard available in the Struts framework? Without this package, it would almost have been impossible to implement most of the requirement of the project I am working on. Do you plan to add it to the next release of Struts? (my vote

Re: nesting beans not standard in Struts?

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
From my perspective, the nesting beans library is still relatively new. Once we add it to the CVS, we are on the hook for maintaining it. Arron recently said he was really, really done this time, but, personally, I'm waiting to see what happens (or doesn't happen ;-). I'd also need to carve some

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5436] New: - struts-html.tld missing the uri element

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5436. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
Any thoughts on this? I'd like to add it to the nightly build, and have it put into the request as part of the Action processing. This will help make Struts available to other presentation systems, like Velocity templates. I've been working with Geir and some others on this, and the early

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5373] - ActionServlet Refactoring

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5373. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class

2001-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:30:02 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class Any thoughts

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4710] - Generic Form Beans

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4710. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
One implementation issue is what to call the thing in the request context. I have this set to be configurable from the web.xml. For lack of a better idea, I'm calling the parameter shared -- the idea it being our shared resources. For a default, I started with the usual, Action.CONTEXT_KEY

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4710] - Generic Form Beans

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4710. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class

2001-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:21:17 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class One

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5395] New: - ActionContext class

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: It wouldn't be hard to make that configurable. It will be configurable, I was just trying to mention that I'm planning to 1) use share to set the attribute name in the web.xml 2) use the typical Struts-type default for the attribute name, so it won't conflict with

Timothy Koontz/HighmarkLife/Highmark is out of the office.

2001-12-14 Thread Timothy . Koontz
I will be out of the office starting 12/14/2001 and will not return until 12/24/2001. I will respond to your message when I return. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: i18n Forwards

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Doing something smart (like a browser-detection mechanism) sounds like a good case for an application subclass of ActionForward that overrides the getPath(Locale) method. Perhaps we should pass in the current request, instead of the Locale, so that the method could

Re: i18n Forwards

2001-12-14 Thread Ted Husted
I was wondering, how would we feel about using Bugzilla for a TODO list. I could convert this thread to a Bugzilla enhancement, and then link to that from the TODO page. Over time, we could cover the TODOs to Enhancements, and then just link to our Bugzilla enhancements for the TODO list. --

Re: Well-formed HTML support in struts 1.01+ !!

2001-12-14 Thread Martin Cooper
Comments interspersed below. - Original Message - From: Morten M. Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:06 AM Subject: Re: Well-formed HTML support in struts 1.01+ !! Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Wed, 12

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5373] - ActionServlet Refactoring

2001-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5373. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.