Re: Security issues with Struts

2002-07-02 Thread Marcel Kruzel
I believe Struts have provide a basic mechanism to resolve the problems associated with the multiple submits. But when considering this in a security issue context, we might have rooms to enhance the mechanism - here is my little thoughts: 1) Since the transaction token is visible by client

Re: Security issues with Struts

2002-07-02 Thread Ted Husted
Marcel Kruzel wrote: Thanx for so many replies! Precisely! the transactionToken does help if You want to detect multiple THE SAME submits. But this is not our issue here. If the second submit contains different values, the session scoped form bean will get populated before I am able to

Re: Help Required - Gnrk

2002-07-02 Thread Ted Husted
Most inquiries regarding how to use Struts should be posted to the USER list. See http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html for more about the best way to ask questions on an open source mailing list. The best advice is to review the list archives to get a feel for how things

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10380] - DynaActionFormClass not serializable

2002-07-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: ActionForm initialization

2002-07-02 Thread Ted Husted
The general workflow is for all requests to go through an Action before they go out to a JavaServer Page. Any objects that need to be initialized should be initialized by the Action, and then forwarded out to the page. If the ActionForm is part of the Action's mapping, then the controller will

Re: RE: FormBeans ... as an Interface.

2002-07-02 Thread Joe Germuska
At 4:03 PM -0400 2002/07/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I'm not proposing autopopulating anything -- the Action has to fetch the value object anyway. I just want to reference it directly using syntax like valueObject.name from my form tags... This *avoids* aupopulating or having to synchronize

Ant build struts 1.1b failed

2002-07-02 Thread Yibing Li
Hi, I got the following error messages when I download the struts 1.1b src and modified build.properties and build.xml. From the error, it looks like that xalan.jar is not included in the classpath so that the class is not found. But I have double checked and have added after all the places

Re: Security issues with Struts

2002-07-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Marcel Kruzel wrote: Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:14:05 +0200 From: Marcel Kruzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Security issues with Struts I believe Struts have provide a

Re: Ant build struts 1.1b failed

2002-07-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Offhand, it looks like you don't have Xalan in your $ANT_HOME/lib directory, of that you're trying to mix in a Xalan from a different version (Ant 1.4 ships with the parser from JAXP/1.1, and you should use the Xalan from the same release versus something later). Craig On Tue, 2 Jul 2002,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10322] - Problems with LookupDispatchAction and other locals

2002-07-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10322. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10322] - Problems with LookupDispatchAction and other locals

2002-07-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10322. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[OFF-TOPIC] JSP 2.0 and Tiles

2002-07-02 Thread John Yu
I spent some time skimming through the JSP 2.0 draft spec. (Close to 400 pages! It makes my head spin... I may not know what I'm talking about.) It seems to me the new Simple Tag Extension + Jsp Fragment is Tiles on steroid. Is my impression close enough to the reality? Or I'm completely off?