DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
IMHO, this is the better forum for this discussion, since it's about the
dependencies we choose to use when *developing* Struts. From a pure user
viewpoint, these are blackbox developer decisions that do not affect
their ability to simply plunk our JARs down.
-Ted.
Robert Leland wrote:
I am
You might as well be asking us for stock tips =:0)
Point in fact, none of us have any control over when it will be
released. If a user finds a drastic bug in the release candidate that
has escaped our notice, then it is unlikely that it would be released
until the issue is resolved. But since
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into getting 1.1 ready for
its first release candidate, it seems to me that David Graham really
came through for us over the last few weeks (months, even).
As a token of our appreciation, I'd like to nominate David for a Most
Valuable Committer award
+1 - I'll drink to that...wait a minute.hell, I'll drink to
anything ;)
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
Beer is the reason we get up each afternoon.
Ray McNeill
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
+1
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into
getting 1.1 ready for
its first release candidate, it seems to me that
David Graham really
came through for us over the last few weeks (months,
even).
As a token of our appreciation, I'd like to
+1
Ted Husted wrote:
While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into getting 1.1 ready for
its first release candidate, it seems to me that David Graham really
came through for us over the last few weeks (months, even).
As a token of our appreciation, I'd like to nominate David for a Most
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
My self deprecating nature makes it difficult to accept but I really
appreciate the recognition. I enjoy being part of this team and respect all
of your opinions.
Thank you,
David
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
+1
On Tuesday, Feb 25, 2003, at 09:02 US/Eastern, Ted Husted wrote:
While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into getting 1.1 ready
for its first release candidate, it seems to me that David Graham
really came through for us over the last few weeks (months, even).
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17273.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:09:10 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
So dbcp, pool, and fileupload still need work. Arron
I think that the just released commons-net 1.0 has taken over from
jakarta-oro.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
snip/
jakarta-oro
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17389.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17389.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I got off topic there. Why do we have a dependency on ORO? Does
one
of the commons-* libraries use it?
Yes, Commons Validator uses it.
--
Martin Cooper
Re nested: Arron has released a fixed jar for people to
No. Jakarta ORO is a text processing package that Validator uses for its
regular expression functionality. Commons Net is an internet protocol suite.
Both packages did originate at ORO, Inc., though. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Byrne, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17389.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17389.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
red-face victim=me /
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
No. Jakarta ORO is a text processing package that Validator
uses for its regular
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin Cooper wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
formal discussions or decisions on what versions of our dependent packages
to include in Struts 1.1 final. Most of them are
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes. Since announcing the Beta, there has been an uptick in user activity,
so there are a number of bugs that need to be addressed. Unfortunately,
FileUpload seems to be a one man show (me) at the moment, with the
original
contributors being conspicuously absent.
It looks like there are 2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I needed (for reasons beyond my control) to have html:form.. create an action=
with a relative
URL. Searching the mailing list, I ran across others who were seeking similar
functionality. I
wrote up a simple addition to FormTag.java that allows an optional isRelative
attribute inside the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The bug poster didn't say the form property wasn't a String,
even if it was a String, doesn't ConvertUtils use NumberFormat
to convert the String to a Number?
No, from WriteTag.java:338
...
...
// Return String object as is.
if ( value instanceof java.lang.String ) {
Peoples,
I'm waiting on a call in the post below about the nested tags. I know they're
not everyone's favorite component, but I do need committer attention to form
the game plan as it's not the typical bug fix.
It's hard to form a consensus opinion on the one response I have.
Copied below for
Failing responses from people who are actually familiar with the nested
tags and your changes, then I think you'll just have to use your own
judgment. I had to make a similar decision recently wrt the Struts-EL
tags. Test your changes as much as possible, and try to get some
feedback from people
I would like to propose that we add the validateTwoFields functionality to
the validator. I don't have the source, so I can't submit a true patch,
but hopefully this e-mail will get the ball rolling.
Add this method, in my case it's in org.appfuse.webapp.util.ValidationUtil:
public
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Karr, David wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:06:52 -0800
From: Karr, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: committers attention - just a few moments...
Failing responses
I also agree with David. The responses I've seen to your fix indicate that
it worked. I think it would be appropriate to commit the fixes now for
release in 1.1. I think an RC2 that included your fix would be appropriate
after we deal with the rest of the open bugs on RC1.
David
From:
Failing responses from people who are actually familiar with the nested
tags and your changes, then I think you'll just have to use your own
judgment. I had to make a similar decision recently wrt the Struts-EL
tags. Test your changes as much as possible, and try to get some
feedback
Tom Roche Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:29:33 -0500
I would appreciate your _opinions_ (which will NOT be held against
you in a court of law!) on the odds that 1.1 final will ship on or
before F 28 Mar 03.
David Graham Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:08:59 -0700
Not good. There are 7 open bug reports to deal with
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dgraham 2003/02/25 20:48:57
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
Log:
retrieveUserLocale now uses the request.getLocale() method for finding the
user's preferred locale. If user has not specified this with Accept-Language
header, the server default locale
dgraham 2003/02/25 20:51:09
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html HtmlTag.java
Log:
The tag now uses RequestUtils.retrieveUserLocale for looking up the appropriate
locale. Using that method protects us from needlessly creating a session
for PR# 17371.
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17371.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17281.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
That bug states that validate required does not work with an ActionForm
property with type java.lang.Integer. Indeed, I tested this with the
struts-validator webapp's type form and required doesn't seem to run for
that field when I changed it from String to Integer. What does happen is
that
Thomas L Roche wrote:
Not good. There are 7 open bug reports to deal with and I'd like to
give people a bit more time to test their apps on the RCs.
Thanks! All I wanted was a gut feel ... _not_ another lecture on
The Apache Way :-P
LOL =:)
David, quite wisely, simply pointed out that RC1 only
Between 1.0 and 1.1 there's a switch that determines whether numerics
like Integer go to 0 or to null. If you have the test setup, try it
again with convertNull set to true as an ActionServlet parameter.
If it then works, we can just document the condition. Since numerics are
not recommended
Arron,
My vote would be to move ahead with the changes. I
have not reviewed the changes, but it looked like
there might be some missmatched resets that would
cause problems in the latest RC. I used the nested
tags extensively on several sites and would rather
deal with minor bugs/patches
dmkarr 2003/02/25 22:12:26
Modified:contrib/struts-el/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/bean
ELMessageTag.java ELPageTag.java ELResourceTag.java
ELSizeTag.java ELStrutsTag.java
Hello,
It seems to us that there is a serious flaw in the struts validation - in
the RequestUtil class, the BeanUtils.populate method is called. In our
testing, this allows an erroneous value to be replaced with a default value
- for example a form class which will set a Short, and the form value
59 matches
Mail list logo
