I had talked last week about building a tag library, composed of tags derived
from the Struts tags, but which use the JSTL expression evaluation engine for
attribute values, instead of using JSP rtexprvalues.
I thought I would give you a little status on how I'm doing with this.
I've finished
On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 22 Jul 2002 09:19:10 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
I had talked last week about building a tag library, composed
On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 22 Jul 2002 09:53:58 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
From: Vic C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
It appears that only HTML tag would need conversion. ?
I would think that logic and bean tag would be deprecated over time
since there is JSTL equivalents as Craig mentioned before, if I recall.
Also, I have
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Struts-dev Newsgroup wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:25:01 -0700
From: Struts-dev Newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL
Struts-dev == Struts-dev Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Struts-dev Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
Struts-dev From: Vic C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Struts-dev ===
Struts-dev It appears that only HTML tag would need conversion. ?
Struts-dev
Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL contrib project - tangent
From: Vic C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Better multi-row support in general, and master-detail in particular,
are
two areas on my wish list for direct support by Struts in a post-1.1
release.
Adding
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11051.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10501.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I want to populate a DynaActionForm before dispatching to a JSP, however
the following doesn't work:
DynaActionForm requestForm = new DynaActionForm();
requestForm.set(subject, subject);
requestForm.set(content, content);
requestForm.set(courseId, cForm.getCourseId());
A stack track may help:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm.getDynaProperty(DynaActionForm.java:539)
at org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm.set(DynaActionForm.java:357)
at
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:40:56 -0600
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPE when setting values on DynaActionForm
I want to populate a DynaActionForm before
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:40:56 -0600
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPE when setting values on
craigmcc2002/07/22 18:02:52
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionFormClass.java
Log:
Make it possible to retrieve a previously configured DynaActionFormClass
instance with the specified name. TODO: ensure that all possible dynamic
form beans have had this
See below.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NPE when setting values
craigmcc2002/07/22 18:17:02
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java
Log:
Ensure that all the configured dynamic form bean classes have been created
at startup time, so that DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass() will
always work. As a side effect,
The required changes to implement this has been checked in, and will be
available in nightly build 20020723 of Struts. The only difference is
that you need to call:
DynaActionForm requestForm =
DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass(requestForm).newInstance();
instead of the
David,
From your original post I assumed you were going to provide JSTL style
struts tags by incorporating the EL functionality of JTSL (I read
somewhere it was going to be split out from the JSTL, perhaps to commons)
with the main aim being that struts developers could use them now (with
Niall == Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Niall David,
From your original post I assumed you were going to provide JSTL style
Niall struts tags by incorporating the EL functionality of JTSL (I read
Niall somewhere it was going to be split out from the JSTL, perhaps to
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 03:28:22 +0100
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
David,
From your
In mapping Struts tags to Struts-EL, I'm wondering about the name attribute
of the generated HTML for these tags, along with the property attribute of
the custom tag, and indexed tags.
In the current Struts library, in the checkbox tag, for instance, the
strategy of setting the name and property
On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 22 Jul 2002 20:07:22 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts-EL: Ideas about name and indexed name attributes?
In mapping Struts tags to Struts-EL, I'm
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig I've been thinking about this issue as well, as you might imagine.
Craig For general form field properties, I'm assuming that we would have to make
Craig the existence of the form bean explict -- say, for example:
27 matches
Mail list logo
