PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: Bugzilla protocol question
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Joe Germuska wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:34:23 -0500
From: Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Tomas Viberg wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:25:44 +0200
From: Tomas Viberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bugzilla protocol question
But even if it probably won't get
In that case, bugs #10007 and #10008 should also be marked as
RESOLVED/WONTFIX.
/ Tomas
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: Bugzilla protocol question
Hi:
Are there any understandings about who marks Bugzilla bugs as
resolved? Earlier tonight, I marked #10006 as Resolved/Wontfix
because it refers to BeanUtils as a Struts component, and it is now a
commons component.
Is this kind of resolution something which is meant to be done only by
