Re: The BIG Check-In for Multi-App Support

2002-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Let's get this new code wrinkled out in the short term so that we can move towards a 1.1 release as well as the 1.0.1 that was just created. Cool. I can put this to work right away in the Artimus package, http://husted.com/scaffolding/dist/artimus.zip since it is

Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Arron Bates
Ted, Take a squizz at the tutorials I put up on my nested extension page. http://www.keyboardmonkey.com/stats (thinking of putting up a support group page for blatant traffic generators anonymous too. You in? :) Starting off with the war file of everything needed with exception of files

Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
Arron Bates wrote: PS: Any tag extensions planned for the Short Term Plans? :) I think most of us are waiting on the JSTL. What we have now seems sufficient, especially in a MVC environment, and I would be concerned about doing anything that would heighten the migration path. Though, the

RE: The BIG Check-In for Multi-App Support

2002-01-13 Thread Michael Nash
Craig: OK, I think I've got it working now -- the support for multiple Struts sub-applications in a single web-app, that is. I'm happy to hear about this, as it's one of the things we extended in Struts 1.0 when we connected it with Expresso, as the sub-app concept was important for Expresso

Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
Take a squizz at the tutorials I put up on my nested extension page. http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=squizz :) -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA. -- Building Java web applications with Struts. -- Tel +1 585 737-3463. -- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/ -- To

RE: The BIG Check-In for Multi-App Support

2002-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Michael Nash wrote: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 10:44:04 -0500 From: Michael Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: The BIG Check-In for Multi-App Support

Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:16:29 -0800 From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS] I know I'm coming in a month late on

Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: What about the stuff that's shared across multiple taglibs (org.apache.struts.util.*, org.apache.struts.action.*, and so on)? I haven't checked them all, but I'd be surprised if *any* of the tag libraries can stand on their own without needing the proposed

Re: Form beans and JAXB........

2002-01-13 Thread Jon Ferguson
Hi Niraj, I don't think their was a suggestion to write another product.. but to use/modify one to give the level of validation necessary. Apparently, Castor can automatically create beans with a validate() method from Schema Now. Problem is that validate method just returns true/false without

Comptability of JSR 127 and Struts [Was: SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread John Yu
I'm wondering how JSR-127 will fit with Struts. While it's beyond my comprehension how JSR-127 will look like and offer, I have this gut feeling that there is an architectural impedance. Frankly, it's still vague to me what and how JSR-127 tries to achieve and I always thought the JSR-127

Multi-App Support the Nested Extension

2002-01-13 Thread Arron Bates
A note to anyone who's interested... Just tested the extension against Craig's code to make sure everything hums along nicely with the Multi-App stuff, and it does. Runs all my tag tests and the monkey examples as they've always run. Out of the 3000 hits to my running examples for the past 14

[VOTE] Proposed Committer Arron Bates

2002-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
Arron has developed an interesting and popular extension to the Struts taglibs. He has been distributing the extension in a very complete and accessible package, and has offered to donate it to Struts. Arron has also been helping out on the lists, and posting elsewhere on Jakarta. I believe he

Re: Comptability of JSR 127 and Struts [Was: SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Yu wrote: Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:13:34 +0800 From: John Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Comptability of JSR 127 and Struts [Was: SHORT TERM PLANS] I'm wondering how

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Committer Arron Bates

2002-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1 Craig On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:07:04 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Proposed Committer Arron Bates Arron has developed an interesting and

Re: [SHORT TERM PLANS]

2002-01-13 Thread Martin Cooper
These are all good points. One reason I had been thinking about splitting each taglib into its own jar is so that we could put the tld file in there as well, instead of having those files loose. With JSP 1.1, the tld file in a packaged taglib must be named taglib.tld, so it's not possible to