]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]
So, I guess, it comes down to in for a penny, in for a pound; are we
ready to cut a beta?
Craig R. McClanahan wrote
+1
Ted Husted wrote:
I agree that a beta based on the current nightly build is a reasonable
course of action for now.
My real regret is that we did not get a chance to cut a 1.1 release
before the last wave of improvements came done the pipeline. My concern
is that either the
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, David Winterfeldt wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:39:22 -0800 (PST)
From: David Winterfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 07:52:03 -0500
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]
I agree
So, I guess, it comes down to in for a penny, in for a pound; are we
ready to cut a beta?
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Subject to adding services (I will be able to work on it this weekend),
+1.
So, pencil in a beta for March 4th?
Martin, you still up for the release manager thing?
--
Ted Husted wrote:
I agree that a beta based on the current nightly build is a reasonable
course of action for now.
My real regret is that we did not get a chance to cut a 1.1 release
before the last wave of improvements came done the pipeline. My concern
is that either the release-cycle will
I can help over the weekend with switching to Commons
Logging since I suggested it. Unless someone else
really wants to. :)
I assume most things will become LOG.debug unless they
are obviously referring to an error.
I see that the Digester class does the following.
I've been doing the latter
:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]
So, I guess, it comes down to in for a penny, in for a pound; are we
ready to cut a beta?
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Subject to adding services (I will be able to work on it this weekend),
+1.
So, pencil
Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:47 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]
Martin Cooper wrote:
If there are incompatibilities that cannot be remedied,
yes
Martin Cooper wrote:
If there are incompatibilities that cannot be remedied, yes. But that is
true of any change we might make from one version to the next. If people
don't want to use new functionality, they don't have to upgrade.
I haven't been able to trace everything back, but I have run
I continue to have misgivings about positioning the new controller with
multi-configuration support as an incremental update to the existing
package. I'm totally on-board with the new controller, but want to be
sure that we are fulfilling our responsibilities to the many
professional teams using
- Original Message -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 6:07 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Modular Applications (the BIG checkin) [LONG]
I continue to have misgivings about positioning the new controller with
multi
12 matches
Mail list logo
