Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-30 Thread Paul Thomas
On 29/12/2003 03:40 Curtis Taylor wrote: This brings up an interesting point (for me, at least): Is anyone on this list developing under Linux w/XEmacs or Emacs? I'm curious as to whether I'm living in the past or not...;-) You're in good company g. I'm using Linux and Emacs/JDE. That's the nice

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-30 Thread Nicholson, Robb
This is just marketing propaganda disguised as a technical article. If you actually make it to the bottom, on the rate this article section, you will notice that most of the votes are for 1 - very poor, with an average rating of 3 out of 10. Seems even those lined up in the MS camp can tell

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 29/12/2003 03:40 Curtis Taylor wrote: This brings up an interesting point (for me, at least): Is anyone on this list developing under Linux w/XEmacs or Emacs? I'm curious as to whether I'm living in the past or not...;-) You're in good company

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-30 Thread Hookom, Jacob
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 12:57 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. Quoting Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 29/12/2003 03:40 Curtis Taylor wrote: This brings up an interesting point (for me, at least): Is anyone

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Hookom, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As a follow up to your by hand comment, isn't Sun developing a new GUI development tool to wizard-ize JSF? Yes: http://wwws.sun.com/software/products/jscreator/index.html Even if it weren't a product coming from the company I work for :-), this one

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-29 Thread Steve Muench
' Subject: RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. but still, I'm not dragging and dropping html form controls (or struts-html.tld taglib controls) to a designer screen, linking code and compiling. I believe that various IDEs are beginning to allow this. I saw a demonstration

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread ....
Frans Thamura, Intercitra wrote: M$ only support people that want to support money, :) I like money and profit too, a lot even; profit is good. But the less $ I give to a vendor, the more for me. The more money I save a client by developing quick and saving them operating costs, the more the

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Martin Gainty
, -Martin Gainty - Original Message - From: Frans Thamura, Intercitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 12:00 AM Subject: Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. yah, M$ and Bill is arogan, they never give the fans a space

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Foux
Hello all, I've nothing against your debate between .NET vs Java ... but does this kind of debate really belong in this mailing list? ;o) Cheers, Foux - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Craig Tataryn
Thamura, Intercitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 23:57:08 -0500 I think this article will explain that Microsoft is not support

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Nick Faiz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. It's kind of a catch .22, I use struts on projects that make money for me. If someone started taking my projects and replicating them for free, I would probably have a problem with it :) Although in this case

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Curtis Taylor
This brings up an interesting point (for me, at least): Is anyone on this list developing under Linux w/XEmacs or Emacs? I'm curious as to whether I'm living in the past or not...;-) - Curtis Taylor (no relation to Robert...;-) On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 17:55, Nick Faiz wrote: but still, I'm not

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Gregory Seidman
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 07:40:34PM -0800, Curtis Taylor wrote: } This brings up an interesting point (for me, at least): Is anyone on } this list developing under Linux w/XEmacs or Emacs? I'm curious as to } whether I'm living in the past or not...;-) A few of us are still out here. Though it's

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-28 Thread Nick Heudecker
I develop with XEmacs on Linux and Windows. You're not living in the past, you're spreading Light to the Great Unwashed. :) I use JDE, tempo, speedbar, pl-cvs, etc. On 2003-40-28 19:12, Curtis Taylor wrote: This brings up an interesting point (for me, at least): Is anyone on this list

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-27 Thread Frans Thamura, Intercitra
I think this article will explain that Microsoft is not support Open Source community, M$ only support people that want to support money, :) Our War Money Chest is bigger than all of you all the Java guys (including the Open Source). [EMAIL PROTECTED] how can M$ have that money? So, this mean

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-27 Thread Frans Thamura, Intercitra
yah, M$ and Bill is arogan, they never give the fans a space, i think they hurting us again, if we are using .NET offcourse. THis case smiliar with mvps.org case, :) never supported by Microsoft, even they are using Microsoft product. So, how about you? Joe Hertz wrote: It was left handed

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-26 Thread Edgar P Dollin
It is a complement that Microsoft is worried about the feature set of struts. However, a lot of the stuff that comes in ASP.NET sounds good compared to the java equivalents. Edgar -Original Message- From: Vic Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 6:16

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-26 Thread J Janesko
It seems that Microsoft has a growing concern for open source solutions. Recently, a Microsoft survey targeted Linux users to find out: *why Linux users have opted not to use Microsoft, *and what Microsoft could do to improve their operating system(s). See:

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-25 Thread isleong
Just like everyone else. http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnet-aspnet-j2ee-struts.asp This was fun to read, it puts a smile on my face. Somone has a chip on their sholder. Great article, Vic. First time there is some Struts-bashing from

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-25 Thread James Mitchell
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just like everyone else. http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html/aspnet-aspnet-j2ee-struts.asp This was fun to read, it puts a smile on my face. Somone has a chip on their sholder. Great article,

Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-25 Thread Joe Hertz
It was left handed bashing. To paraphrase- Bill was announcing .NET when Struts was only a glimmer in Craig's eye. Microsoft is committed to .NET and therefore .NET is Windows. With Struts/J2EE you are at the mercy of whoever develops the implementation of the Servlet Container, et al, or

RE: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better.

2003-12-25 Thread Andrew Hill
... sigh/ -Original Message- From: Joe Hertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 December 2003 14:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: .NET: We are just like Struts... only better. It was left handed bashing. To paraphrase- Bill was announcing .NET when Struts was only a glimmer