CachedRowSet or SQL, what is the best way?

Is anyone using the early access of CachedRowSet for data access, or are people just using straight JDBC calls? I've been using straight JDBC calls, but it looks like CachedRowSet would be easier. Anyone know when it will be officially released? Is it currently stable? Thanks, Ryan

RE: CachedRowSet or SQL, what is the best way?

: 05 September 2001 15:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CachedRowSet or SQL, what is the best way? Is anyone using the early access of CachedRowSet for data access, or are people just using straight JDBC calls? I've been using straight JDBC calls, but it looks like CachedRowSet would be easier

Re: CachedRowSet or SQL, what is the best way?

Ryan Cornia [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks: Is anyone using the early access of CachedRowSet for data access, or are people just using straight JDBC calls? I've been using straight JDBC calls, but it looks like CachedRowSet would be easier. Anyone know when it will be officially released?

Re: CachedRowSet or SQL, what is the best way?

CachedRowSet seems fine for read-only accesses, but I'm told that inserts and updates can be flakey (or impossible) with some drivers. I have used RowSets extensively for accesses, and never had a problem. The Jakarta TagLibs dbTag has also been recently extended so that you can use read-only