On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Perhaps we could go back to build gtk, pygtk, etc inside jhbuild as we
used to do a year ago? Should be pretty easy for someone like Reinier
to restore and maintain support for Ubuntu Hardy, I think.
If someone wants to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Reinier Heeres rein...@heeres.eu wrote:
Marco,
Support for Ubuntu 8.04 also seems to have been dropped (in
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar-jhbuild;a=commitdiff;h=9cc90cdeaf8670a00dd2a3999239a7c0abf2ed24).
Is this necessary due to unavailable packages or
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the details:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DesignTeam/Meetings#Thursday_December_4.2C_2008_-_15.00_.28UTC.29
Apologies for the late reminder. In the back of my head I thought
that was automated now, but either I'm
Hello,
as previously announced we have a now an upstream mailing list for Sugar
development:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/
My suggestion would be to close sugar@lists.laptop.org and have the few
distribution specific discussions in [EMAIL PROTECTED] *If* there is
full
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
This ends up being an excellent division of responsibility. OLPC can
focus their resources more heavily on specific deployment issues.
Sugar Labs can take a more innovative and upstream footing.
For the record, I agree
Please let's avoid speculations until the joint statement is published.
Thanks,
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Sascha Silbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Not sure if this is the correct list but I couldn't find a better match.
I'm currently trying to install sugar (Sucrose) on Debian lenny (fresh
install on a laptop) using sugar-jhbuild (the official packages are
I'm quoting from Mel blog post (go read it *now* !):
http://blog.melchua.com/2008/11/22/instead-of-brainstorming/
Me too, Mel!
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I may be the last one to say that, but Mel is awesome.
I'm finding it hard to tell how much she is... we need to invent new
words for her :)
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
For me this was the first time in my life that I was in the same room
with a group this large of developers and assorted geeks. In many ways
it felt like a very new experience, very humbling, but also empowering,
I wanted to thanks everyone that was at the conference today and
during all the week. I'm psyched by the amount of progress we made and
by all the interesting talks we had. I'm very tired (a full week
conference is *long*) but also really really sad that tomorrow is the
last day.
Marco
Make sense to me.
Marco
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone.
As Walter can't come and we have community meeting at the same hour, also
taking into count that Walter's reports are essential on this discussion ,
I propose to
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Brendan Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer Thursday, as I'm not sure when I'm leaving on friday.
Added on Thursday! I think it also makes a perfect combination with
the rest of the talks that day, yay!
Brendan, so you have the LTSP talk with
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, several people have pointed to http://gitorious.org as a
good place to host your projects in git. Though right now it's down so
may not be such a good idea? :/ But there's also http://github.com.
Works for me :)
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Marco and me compared our schedules for the next week trip and thought
that, as we arrive a bit late on Sunday, may be a good idea to meet
somewhere in Cambridge for dinner.
So, what about meeting for having
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of this criticism is certainly funded: 0.82 was the first release
cycle entirely coordinated Sugar Labs. But many would agree that 0.82
was a *huge* leap forward done in just 6 months by a very resource
constraint
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, what are these talks with no title you scheduled Tuesday after
dinner?
1900 Marco Gritti / Michael Stone
2000 C. Scott Ananian / Tomeu Vizoso
I think the idea is that the speaker manages their half hour...
Hello!
I'm excited that Guillaume Desmottes is joining us at Sugarcamp, and
we can actually have a good discussion about our collaboration
infrastructure. I'm eager to learn about it and to figure out a
roadmap for 0.84 and beyond. He will arrive on Monday afternoon
(17h30) and go back Wednesday
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
edited
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp/Schedule#Tuesday_the_18th
with this data
Maybe it'll end up being Content Collaboration day
I for one see them very, very related and dependent on each other.
Sounds great!
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can join by phone too after noon on Tuesday, although I would prefer IRC.
The planning section (13 - 15) sounds like the good time to present
the stuff you have been working on! I think being on the phone
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 17:11, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I'm excited that Guillaume Desmottes is joining us at Sugarcamp, and
we can actually have a good discussion about our collaboration
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the time slot in http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp/Schedule (Saturday)
doesn't match what Gregorio said he could attend to. What about Friday
instead?
I moved Gregorio on Thu 10 - 12. Please let me know if there is
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
To properly support BIDI, and to make things easier for activity
developers in the long run, I think it may be a good idea to support
stock items in Sugar. We should ideally support the standard GTK
Hello!
we made a lot of progress on the planning. This is what is left to do
on my page:
* Caroline and Brendan needs to schedule time for a co-talk about ltsp
and Sugar on stick. (1 or 2 hours?)
* Need to confirm in Brendan can make his talk about collaboration in
the collab planning slot (Tue
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Need to convince Mel to lead Contributing to Sugar brainstorm and
to schedule time (proposal Fri 17-19)
Done! Mel accepted :)
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday OLE people are available only in the morning.
I have penciled in 11:30, would that work?
(wasn't able to wikify the breack in the row :-))
(this also frees the 1500 slot)
What about giving the 15 slot to
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should be arriving late afternoon on Monday, and probably leaving late
afternoon on Friday. So the sugarstick/ltsp talk could happen any time there.
It seems Wednesday is completely full, so Tuesday, Thursday, or
More progress and another update:
* Caroline and Brendan needs to schedule time for a co-talk about ltsp
and Sugar on stick. (1 or 2 hours?)
* Place Edward talk (about ebook?). We have a slot free on Saturday
morning, that might be ideal if you are there on Saturday.
* If anyone has talks he
A couple of points.
* This is a Sugar Labs organized conference, OLPC specific stuff is
not appropriate for it. XOcamp is in January. I edited the wiki
accordingly, both the talks and the schedule.
* Please don't do planning on the agenda during closed, in person
meetings. #sugar-meeting is the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, talks that IMO are more appropriate for this week, along with
people I'm most interested in hearing, are:
- How Sugar-on-a-stick can better work for deployments such as the
ones carried on by http://schoolkey.net
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:35 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what the hell? i don't think it's productive to separate olpc and
sugarlabs in this fashion.
Personally I think the way you keep to couple them is *extremely*
confusing. Red Hat people certainly participates to GNOME
Then please add yourself to the wiki!!!
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp#Attendees
Several people that I know are coming are not on the list yet...
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:11 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have also included the information that Walter will be giving
his 'Portfolio' talk at 9am on Friday. Just in case anyone was
wondering about his absence from the above schedule. Oh, and we'll do
our best to
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mel, SJ and C.Scott: let's have a meeting tomorrow @ 2PM to partition the
available time between Sugar talks, Sugar Labs marketing, OLPC employee
meetings and the much anticipated Sugar hackathon.
Christian Schmidt is
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose a discussion on making the collaboration a bit more
standards compliant. The idea would be to get sugar to function more like a
standard jabber IM client, as well as using existing standards in
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I noticed we also run the window manager from there and it
would make a lot of sense to keep the composing manager next to it.
Some modern window managers even do both things.
Perhaps these things should be
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== Community jams, meet-ups, and meetings ===
6. SugarCamp: While not all of the details are in place, we will be
holding a Sugar Camp in Cambridge the week of 17 November. We've
reserved a room at the Cambridge
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, our journal use model says that the document is picked before
the app is called, so if we support
$ sugar-wrapper Write.xo mydocument.rtf
then we're done. (Again, I might be extraordinarily naive about this :-)
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, our journal use model says that the document is picked before
the app is called, so if we support
$ sugar
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two issues here:
1. I don't know how the inner workings are designed, but as a Python
activity author I never have to write a datastore call. My impression is
that the Journal asks Rainbow's launcher
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is simply that we could create a very thin dummy layer that
provides the launcher API and datastore API but implements them very
simply. For example, the object selector would simply pop up the GTK
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subclassing makes sense to me (though I'm just a designer, so don't
give me too much weight.) It seems that we could create a
CollaborativeActivity subclass, and perhaps even subclass that if
there are several common types
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking about how to extend the appeal (and long term viability!) of
sugar activities, one thing that appears as a clear opportunity is to
create a wrapper that allows to run sugar activities in a conventional
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Yamandu Ploskonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have hit with a generous donor that might pay my way...
Could you confirm dates so they can get me tickets early while they are
still less expensive?
I would want to learn and share, and if possible/if there
Hello,
I wrote a quick script to generate a boot cd for a liveusb image with
overlay. It can be useful on old systems which doesn't support boot
from usb.
http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/livecd-iso-to-boot.sh
http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/boot.iso (for the latest sugar-spin.iso)
Marco
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd really like to be at the Sugar planning meeting, so the 18th is
not my first choice. Why not do the hackfest on Tuesday and split the
technical talks between Monday and Wednesday?
Monday is even worst for OLPC employees
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with David that this is a good logical order. Mon and Tue
aren't good days for some OLPC folks, but they might make good
hackfest days.
We could make sure to schedule talks OLPC employee gives or needs to
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Monday 17 - Hackfest. Mel: might be a good time to do a so,
coders in Boston, you've wanted to learn how to help out
This would be hard for Monday. But the following weekend might work.
(Saturday?)
Saturday is taken by
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Mel Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saturday is taken by SL planning... :/
It's also the start of Thanksgiving week, which is a holiday that many US
folks (myself included) may be taking off to celebrate with family and such.
Also, I think the 17th is basically
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Bill Bogstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all of this discussion of Sugar on a USB, it's not clear what part
of the taxonomy from here:
http://www.sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy
is being discussed. Do the activities (fructose/honey) always come
from the user's
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The D-Bus method signature has always specified that property values
are variants, thus the D-Bus level of the API hasn't changed.
Ah ok, I thought the dbus signature was changed.
It also has to be said that the change is
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It worked for me with Chat, with the following notes:
Wow, thanks for testing!
* It depends on python-feedparser - should I add this to the ubuntu sysdeps?
The tool is currently separated from jhbuild (it can work also
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29.10.2008, at 03:42, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
I don't see how it would be inconsistent that when an activity saves a
title meta-data property which obviously is a string, and it resumes, to
expect
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a data blob.
It *is* a blob in Tomeu design, which I'll let him defend.
Yeah but the interface was written for a datastore which had a notion
of metadata property type (although a very bad one). The new one
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Bobby Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a plan to start up joyride again so we can (somewhat more
easily) test this stuff out? Or is that waiting till after XOcamp2?
Did I maybe miss the email thread about this?
Joyride was apparently restarted today
+1 about inclusion from me, based on Walter and Rafael explanations. Thanks!
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
I updated according to the discussion in the irc meeting and put it on the wiki:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/API_policy
Also I marked the sugar package modules as described above.
Please make sure to have a look, we will need to maintain the
stability promises we are making. In
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28.10.2008, at 04:01, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Dear maintainers,
the next stable release is the 30th October.
Just for the record - it is an unstable release :)
Is this basically
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess I should make Etoys cope with the changed datastore interface
then.
Did the interface change? I think tomeu new datastore actually has the
same dbus interface...
Marco
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, some of the API uses variable types, so even if the interface does
not change literally, changing the types involved poses a problem.
E.g., meta-data properties are declared as dictionary with string keys but
I would like to give a try to explaining *why* I think we need to
establish Sugar as an independent upstream project and to discuss a
roadmap on *how* to gradually get there. Given the strong feelings and
the complexity of the issue, I'm willing to give the talk only if we
will be present in
Hello,
I think there is no reason to introduce a deadline for new modules
proposal other than the feature freeze, currently planned for December
21. We should evaluate proposals as they get in. I will give a stab to
the three proposal presented so far now, so that we get the new
modules in
There seem to be consensus on the inclusion of image activity. Unless
someone objects I'll add it to the list of modules. Please make sure
to do a release for 0.83.1.
Thanks!
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
I think we should include it. Great educational value, well polished
and now maintained.
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
Hello,
I have to admit that I haven't played a lot with Measure but I heard
very good things about it. I have a couple of doubts/questions for
everyone:
1 Is the activity useful outside the XO hardware? Does it retain its
interest and educational value?
2 Should we include in Fructose activities
Why no one is posting the good press these days and I have to find it
out myself??? :)
http://www.olpcnews.com/software/sugar/xo_laptop_software_upgrade_review.html
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
Hello,
I wrote an helper script to do release of modules using auto* or
bundlebuilder. It's in the sugar-tools git repository:
git://dev.laptop.org/users/marco/sugar-tools
Just run the release script inside your module directory and it should:
* Bump version, tag and push to git. (You can use
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Our company and developers are interested in getting involved with the
development community for Sugar. We deploy Linux desktop solutions in schools
in the United States via thin client and fat client
Hello,
I spent some time looking into the various tickets about oom and
BadAlloc crashes in trac today. Here is a summary of the problems.
A) There is a bug in cairo which causes BadAlloc on very big images.
Fixes are in 1.8 and should be possible to backport to 1.6.4.
B) Xulrunner renders
http://www.gnome.org/~federico/news-2008-10.html#23
It's nice to not feel alone in this space anymore, isn't it??
Also finally a little of credit which doesn't hurt :)
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
Gadget requires a more recent version of glib than those shipped by these
distro. The policy would be to keep support for 2 stable versions of Fedora
and Ubuntu. Both new stable are going to be released pretty soon, so I hope
this won't be too much of an issue.
I turned off the Fedora 8 buildbot.
Am I the only to have missed this paper?
http://www.teachingmatters.org/evaluations/olpc_kappa.pdf
The bits about the Journal makes me think that it's really the right idea,
and it will rock as soon as we have a decent implementation of it. Also see
the section about what they disliked... our
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Andrés Ambrois [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Just a couple of notes.
[PATCH] sugar-homewindow-no-transition.patch
This removes the usage of TransitionBox from HomeWindow.py. TransitionBox
is
used to animate the Xo Guy while moving between zoom levels.
This
Hello,
Tomeu needed a way to test git master on the XO. I initially though to write
scripts to generate snapshot rpms, but then I figured out something much
cheaper. I wrote a very simple script to do a sugar-jhbuild inside mock,
using the olpc-3 configuration (my bash skills are very poor,
Hello,
when I tried out the 0.83 snapshot rpm, I noticed that activity startup felt
unusually fast. I was surprised especially considering the fact that I had
to disable security and hence the preload hack.
So I did a bit testing with two XO running one 2515 and the other 2515 +
sugar 0.83
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Andrés Ambrois [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Just a couple of notes.
[PATCH] sugar-homewindow-no-transition.patch
This removes the usage of TransitionBox from HomeWindow.py
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:10 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi there,
with the generous help from #sugar devs I managed to get ltsp, sugar
and collaboration via ejabberd working on Ubuntu. This is really
exciting as it means walking into an existing networked lab with a
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Luke Faraone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I've been working on packaging Sugar for Ubuntu, and have looked forward to
what will be Sugar (and Ubuntu )'s next release cycle.
Per http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap , it seems that the first
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:53 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I expect that a concrete schedule will be hammered out during the Nov
17 joint OLPC 9.1/Sugarlabs 0.84 planning meeting. I hope that OLPC's
schedule will not drift much from Sugarlab's, because it is
counterproductive
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:54 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually feature freeze is 21 December. We might decide to push it off a
bit, but I don't think it will go after 18 February. So I think
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* making sugar behave well when run in non-full-screen-mode under
metacity. This includes refactoring home/friends/mesh view as
operations on root window, so they make sense in a multiwindow setup.
(It's been
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current plan is to wait until F10 is released (end of November)
before rebasing Joyride onto it.
But the decision to rebase has been made?
Thanks,
Marco
___
Sugar mailing list
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:54 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually feature freeze is 21 December. We might decide
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we stop referring to anything non-sugary as a legacy app.
i'd submit that we all use dozens of such apps every day, most
of which are in no danger of going away anytime soon. :-)
I'm using standard desktop applications :)
Marco
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's hammer this out in person at the planning meeting, because it
depends on OLPC picking a release date.
Yeah, make sense. As I said, I think we (as SL) should defer decisions about
the freeze slip until the
Hello,
commit dd2c13d56672d7ff7e69f59138c1bf3493e3dddf
Author: Guillaume Desmottes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Oct 17 17:37:36 2008 +0100
upgrade to telepathy-glib 0.7.17
This adds a dependency on glib 2.16. It would mean to drop support for
Fedora 8 and the equivalent Ubuntu version. My
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we could also investigate the use of the xdg utilities for
managing mimetype associations and installing activities?
Good point. I've
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it's done right now is to copy mime information to ~/.local at
installation time.
I know. I personally don't like requiring
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi Marco,
I'd like a Wiki page where you and I can track tasks that need to be done
before I can do the next test run at each of the 2 schools and also write
down which version of Sugar we plan to test next at which
Hello Scott,
I chatted a bit with Eben on how to go forward on the Journal, and we think
it would be good to make it *the* topic for tomorrow design meeting. Are you
able to make it? It's at 11.30 your time, on irc.
There are two main things that I really want to figure out:
* What is the
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:57 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not premature, but we probably won't nail down the answer yet.
Sure.
I've already got mockups and more, but there are some corner cases I
don't know the answers for.
Activities can just use GtkFileChooser.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Sebastian Dziallas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/olpc/liveusb-creator-3.0.zip
I tried this on windows xp. I unzipped the directory on the Desktop and run
the executable. It didn't work. I'm attaching the log... any idea?
Marco
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) I made a new one, but then left it in my computer at home
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:19:44PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Sebastian Dziallas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/olpc/liveusb-creator-3.0.zip
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Caroline Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good progress!
Test results.
- It does not work on my IBM Thinkpad laptop. Looks like a video driver
issue? It appears to boot, gets through the progress bar but then I get a
blank white screen.
Feels
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Giovanna: Why not to enable shut-down from the XO icon of any of the
standard view? The icon is always there in the middle of screen but works
only in one... (in general, maybe enabling the hoovering menu in all of
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we should not have a shutdown button at all :)
Even though this comment was accompanied by a smiley, a software
shutdown button somewhere is useful.
Sure, I was ironic... The point was that shutdown is a use
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
But this power-button UI could be in addition to a regular menu, which
should not be invoked from the home view but from the frame's device
section.
A computer device was already brought up for something else that I
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Wade Brainerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These issues could best be solved by a sugar-webcontent-activity package
which is shipped by default. It would contain the Browse GUI classes plus a
template Activity class. It would also provide a base WebServer class
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hello,
I spent some time trying to nail down the concrete changes we will need to
properly support standard desktop applications in Sugar 0.84. Here are some
notes. It's *not* a huge amount of work and I think we
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
