i am still working out the new html/css layout for adding_up
you can check it out here
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/karma/repos/mainline/blobs/master/examples/adding_up_to_10/mytest.html
i still haven't tested out animation in this layout. I spent most of
this week figuring out basic css
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kerrbillk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com
wrote:
After a discussion with the FSF, they agreed the picture was not really
appropriate and that the text should clearly distinguish OLPC from Sugar.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:29, Ben Wiley Sittlerbsitt...@gmail.com wrote:
A friend of mine wrote a hand/eye coordination game called SarynPaint
and recently released the source code. SarynPaint is written in Java,
so you'll need to install OpenJDK to use it. I just checked in minimal
support
Abbyy could distribute the free version of their software with a
license that allows it to be redistributed with Sugar, or more
precisely whatever activity uses it. But that would allow people to
make full-featured clones of Abbyy's software, so I doubt it.
2009/8/28 Edward Cherlin
Hi,
several development groups are being formed right now in Latin America
and in order to make easier for them to work together a new list has
been created:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-desarrollo
Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about
Sugar development
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 13:38, Luke Faraonel...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:15, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about
Sugar development in Spanish.
Won't this have the side effect of a segmented development
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:26:41AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 02:40:38AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/01/09 08:39, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I need much more details; *all* Award BIOSes make in the past 10-12
years have version number 6.00PG.
Ouch, I no longer
Well, I wasn't attempting to solve anything. I thought I was just
brainstorming.
These past few weeks there have been a lot of discussions about
processes. Meanwhile, I am heading into the classroom with a
somewhat unstable and unfinished platform not to mention very little
guidance as to
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
Well, I wasn't attempting to solve anything. I thought I was just
brainstorming.
These past few weeks there have been a lot of discussions about
processes. Meanwhile, I am heading into the classroom with a
somewhat unstable and unfinished platform
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 15:17 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
BTW, are all these details about USB booting being collected somewhere
on a wiki page?
it would be great if someone could expand this paragraph:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Soas#Boot
This page is not even linked from it:
This is a bit of a stretch, but would it be possible to distribute
GIMPLE or LLVM IR and finish the compilation on installation?
Installing would take longer, but it should work on any architecture
the code can compile to.
2009/8/29 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié
Your points are well taken and generally I agree with them. Except
that I never suggested you should abandon upstream development.
Sugar is your calling card, your differentiator, your trademark, your
value added... etc, etc, etc. It's what make you, you. :-) I would
never think of abandoning
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 10:25 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió:
Well, the USB format idea was left unimplemented as we (I) couldn't
get it working, but we should probably take a look at makebootfat to
achieve the same goals.
Or just use parted instead of fdisk to wipe the MBR and create it
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
Your points are well taken and generally I agree with them. Except
that I never suggested you should abandon upstream development.
Sugar is your calling card, your differentiator, your trademark, your
value added... etc, etc, etc. It's what make
2009/8/29 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
Your points are well taken and generally I agree with them. Except
that I never suggested you should abandon upstream development.
Sugar is your calling card, your differentiator, your trademark, your
value added... etc, etc, etc. It's what make
Lucian Branescu wrote:
This is a bit of a stretch, but would it be possible to distribute
GIMPLE or LLVM IR and finish the compilation on installation?
Installing would take longer, but it should work on any architecture
the code can compile to.
Currently, Sugar has a number of blessed
I suggested pre-parsed code mostly to get rid of dependency on headers
and other source packages; a bit like a JIT that always compiles and
caches everything. LLVM IR in particular is just a high lever
assembler, so it could be distributed without any dependencies (even
on build tools).
There's
Hi Ben,
On 29 Aug 2009, at 18:24, Ben Wiley Sittler wrote:
I think, then, that I would rather just ship it as an activity bundle
for Sugar+Java or Sugar+OpenJDK, since the versioning issues (which
OpenJDK version should I use, exactly?), licensing issues (GPLv2
GPLv2+classpath-exception for
The list was created to ensure and give the possibility to people that
don't know English or are not to confident in it to participate in
Sugar development,
We'll hope that students and developers from all Spanish-speaking
countries take the lead and begin to support the overall sugar
Bill Kerr billk...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote:
After a discussion with the FSF, they agreed the picture was not really
appropriate and that the text should clearly distinguish OLPC from Sugar.
They will make
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here experimented with it?
Regards,
Michael
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here experimented with it?
Regards,
Michael
Just a quick heads up that it looks like google will be running a
second round of GHOP[1].
It will likely be later this year or early next year.
So high school teachers and students let's start thinking about this.
Any volunteers ready to stick up hand their to run the program for
SL:)
The cool
Walter,
I tried deleting /etc/olpc-security but that had no effect, Even
rebooting after deleting olpc-security had no effect. I managed to
copy the log messages from my previous efforts to the clipboard and
save them to a thumb drive:
reserved credentials (10002, 10005)
adding group:
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is
(Regarding 0install):
It is interesting, but fails horribly badly in the case of no, or low
bandwidth Internet.
I'm not convinced, for three reasons.
First, there is 0share
http://0install.net/0share.html
which seems to me to be remarkably similar to our long-stated goal of
horizontal
http://www.slideshare.net/moodler/moodle-development-educause-australia-6th-may-2009
expected end 2009 - early 2010
--
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Hi Aleksey,
On 30 Aug 2009, at 01:23, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
Gary C Martin wrote:
How many ebooks could you distribute (and
store) for the bandwidth (and nand space) taken up by downloading the
required dependancies for Java.
A hell of a lot. That's why we need to display prominently exactly how
much space each item in the Journal takes, including
30 matches
Mail list logo
