On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
{...}
Here is a tighter spiral of 74 icons for the home view
I am heading off to vacation for a week, but I may get a chance to
play with moving/snapping the icons as well. In the meantime, the code
is quite simple:
--- favoriteslayout.py 2010-07-20 13:31:05.0 -0400
+++ favoriteslayout.py 2010-07-30 23:26:56.0 -0400
+
+class
I have a version which will let you reposition the icons (haven't
added swap yet) but I am not sure how best to reset the layout. We
could have a separate icon on the Home View secondary palette that
will reset the spiral to an initial state. Any other ideas?
-walter
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:40
I agree that 'hiding' the action buttons away in a toolbar is rather
unfortunate :-( , but wouldn't placing buttons as in the original
layout eat up vertical space?
No more than before (as has been the design for years).
The old design with the buttons in the middle always struck me as
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Anish Mangal
anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that 'hiding' the action buttons away in a toolbar is rather
unfortunate :-( , but wouldn't placing buttons as in the original
layout eat up vertical space?
No more than before (as has been the design
With this version, I n longer have an edit toolbar. This is a regression.
No (and neither does the current Pippy-36 version), I've yet to merge
that code into the mainline. This was just for testing out local
toolkit.
It really is not so difficult to maintain toolbars across different
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 08:04:35PM +0530, Anish Mangal wrote:
I agree that 'hiding' the action buttons away in a toolbar is rather
unfortunate :-( , but wouldn't placing buttons as in the original
layout eat up vertical space?
No more than before (as has been the design for years).
Matt,
In order to reduce the maintain burden OLPC Debian and Ubuntu
Sugarteam have a rather distinct workflow. Would you mind joining IRC
#ubuntu-sugarteam between 9am and noon and 9pm and mid night? We have
developers from around the world working so those are two prefer
times we try to be
On 30.07.2010, at 20:25, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Christian,
Hi Chris--to address scalability we have a list view from which
you can select favorite activities to go in the ring. This is a
similar technique to the OSX dock or Windows taskbar.
I don't think this is working out.
Yep. The
Hi all,
Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
The reasons to not reuse package name - it is not regular
(GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
* primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not centralized
which is the core point of regular distros
* sugar packages
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
The reasons to not reuse package name - it is not regular
(GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
* primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install)
On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
The reasons to not reuse package name - it is not regular
(GNU/Linux distributions) packages, because:
* primal deploying model is decentralized (via 0install) not
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote:
On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering, how to name Sugar Packages.
The reasons to not reuse package name - it is not regular
(GNU/Linux distributions) packages,
Hi all,
What about having normal favions and icons for SL sites (current favions
looks for me like $ symbols).
I already have a couple of ideas:
* library icon for activities.sl.o like
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4089
I hope after switching to new AMO codebase, ASLO
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 01:00:04AM +0100, Gary Martin wrote:
On 31 Jul 2010, at 23:24, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
{...}
so, 3:0 for cubes..
Sugar cubes nicely suggest a regular, ordered volume
On 1 August 2010 12:11, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
so, 3:0 for cubes..
I guess the place where these cubes are produced could be named
refinery.sugarlabs.org
+1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
