Excerpts from Anish Mangal's message of Sat Nov 20 06:59:36 +0100 2010:
Let's keep the discussion exclusively on sugar-devel, please.
Cross-posting can cause thread fragmentation. I also don't see any
value in discussing all Dextrose-related technical decisions on two
lists in parallel.
I've
Excerpts from Art Hunkins's message of Sat Nov 20 05:13:30 +0100 2010:
I think I may have answered my previous question: Feature unavailable in
Sugar 0.82.
FWIW, I think this is the right thing to do from a development PoV. The
wording is fine, too.
It will also increase the incentive for
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Anish Mangal's message of Sat Nov 20 06:59:36 +0100 2010:
Let's keep the discussion exclusively on sugar-devel, please.
Cross-posting can cause thread fragmentation. I also don't see any
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:06:56AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
Martin and I talked for bit this evening and I believe that I managed to
persuade him to support my [UI Dictator team] proposal.
I do, for the reasons mentioned in Michael's key arguments.
P.S. - Later [...] we discovered a
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 04:27:49AM +, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:53:06AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
(Just trying to summarize previous discussions, including recent one
on #sugar with some kind of motion)
= The problem =
[...]
= Engineering
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Martin Dengler
mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:06:56AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
Martin and I talked for bit this evening and I believe that I managed to
persuade him to support my [UI Dictator team] proposal.
I do, for the reasons
On 20 November 2010 02:53, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
= The problem =
Current situation with stuck patches queue is dangerous. Deployments
have to support their own big branches (branches, by themselves, is not
bad but big ones), at last I know about Dextrose. Such splitting
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:29:13PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 20 November 2010 02:53, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
= The problem =
Current situation with stuck patches queue is dangerous. Deployments
have to support their own big branches (branches, by themselves, is not
As an advocate for Sugar in the field in my work, I'm chiming in to support
Walter's point.
What might help Sugar is a designer who can articulate a strong design point
of view by understanding the needs of the users and translating them, guided
by the Sugar core design principles, into a plan
On 20 November 2010 14:38, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
If OLPC doesn't shipp downstream patches thats relly good but I guess it
is because last stable OLPC sugar is 0.84 and that OLPC people are maints
of 0.84 branches.
Dextrose has patches that are collected based on responce
Hello:
alsroot said to contact you about the Control Panel Activity upgrade to
IRC-7 I just did for Soas-v3-Mirabelle in Virtual box on a MacBook Air.
IRC -7 works well as it starts in #sugar. I can talk/receive
then I do a /join #sugar-meeting. and it talks
I then shut down the activity.
I
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu wrote:
One more question:
This code tests for the presence of an XO-1 (thanks originally to Walter):
if os.path.exists(/sys/power/olpc-pm):
Normally this is also a test for Sugar 0.82. I want, however, also to test
for Sugar
Hi Martin,
On 20 Nov 2010, at 09:32, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:06:56AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
Martin and I talked for bit this evening and I believe that I managed to
persuade him to support my [UI Dictator team] proposal.
I do, for the reasons mentioned in
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 at 09:32:53 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:06:56AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
P.S. - Later [...] we discovered a confusion about the mandate of
the proposed committee; to wit:
Is the main purpose of the committee to act as a UI Maintainer (e.g.,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 at 09:32:53 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:06:56AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
P.S. - Later [...] we discovered a confusion about the mandate of
the proposed committee; to
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 11:17 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Yes, I prefer as well the term remove over kill in commit messages.
Please reference as well the ticket if there is one at the end of the
commit message (e.g. Remove mute toggle #1234).
Can we switch to the convention of adding a
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:07:00PM -0800, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
IRC -7 works well as it starts in #sugar. I can talk/receive
then I do a /join #sugar-meeting. and it talks
I then shut down the activity.
I then resume the activity.
The 2 tabs show but i get a */no one to talk to message.
Since HAND_OPEN in sugar
http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-artwork/mainline/blobs/master/cursor/sugar/sugar-00.png
http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-artwork/mainline/blobs/master/cursor/sugar/sugar.cursortheme
is not available here:
http://www.pygtk.org/docs/pygtk/class-gdkcursor.html
How do I use
18 matches
Mail list logo
