Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Start filtered activity with keyboard

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/07/2011 01:06 PM, godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: From: Gonzalo Odiardgodi...@gmail.com This patch complement the filter functionality in the home view. If only one activity is selected, Return key start the activity. Signed-off-by: Gonzalo Odiardgonz...@laptop.org Thanks for the patch.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-toolkit] Bundlebuilder: don't fail to package if git is not installed, OLPC #11341

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/24/2011 02:43 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-21 12:27:02 +0200: We need to make sure that we do not fail if git is not installed and use the same fallback code as if we are in a directory where no git information is present. How about:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-toolkit] Bundlebuilder: don't fail to package if git is not installed, OLPC #11341

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/21/2011 01:40 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think we should fallback to use a manifest file if present. In particluar, the wikipedia activity can be builded with different data files, but the same codebase, and is using a manifest file to select the included files. Anyway, is he only case.

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Bundlebuilder: don't fail to package if git is not installed, OLPC #11341

2011-11-10 Thread from = Simon Schampijer
From: Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de When git is installed, it will return non-zero if it gets asked to list the files in a non-git-repository. The subprocess.Popen instantiation is successful in this case and the returncode attribute will contain the error code from git. The current code

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Toolbars review

2011-11-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Thanks Gary and Manuel! Great Team :) Gonzalo ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Start filtered activity with keyboard

2011-11-10 Thread Gary Martin
Hi Simon, On 10 Nov 2011, at 08:09, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/07/2011 01:06 PM, godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: From: Gonzalo Odiardgodi...@gmail.com This patch complement the filter functionality in the home view. If only one activity is selected, Return key start the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Start filtered activity with keyboard

2011-11-10 Thread Frederick Grose
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi Simon, On 10 Nov 2011, at 08:09, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/07/2011 01:06 PM, godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: From: Gonzalo Odiardgodi...@gmail.com This patch complement the filter

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Start filtered activity with keyboard

2011-11-10 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Thanks for the patch. Design question: your approach is that the 'start with return' functionality is only available if there is a clear match. The other option would be to choose one of the matches to be the default one (this is the behavior that the GNOME shell is using, go to hot corner

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SPAM?]: Re: [PATCH] Start filtered activity with keyboard

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/10/2011 06:16 PM, Gary Martin wrote: Hi Simon, On 10 Nov 2011, at 08:09, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.de wrote: On 11/07/2011 01:06 PM, godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: From: Gonzalo Odiardgodi...@gmail.com This patch complement the filter functionality in the home view. If only one

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
This is an example of a dd writable SoaS-v2.img file which produces a fully functional Conventional install on a USB. This is equivalent to a liveinst install to USB.[1] It was first suggested by bernie [2] in early 2010 as a better alternative to the currently used live USB SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] A dismiss all functionality for notifications?

2011-11-10 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Am 10.11.2011 17:33 schrieb Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com: Hi Christoph, On 9 Nov 2011, at 23:25, Christoph Derndorfer christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, while playing around with 11.3.0 today I spent some time sending Memorize files back and forth between two XOs.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

2011-11-10 Thread Art Hunkins
Yes, SoaS v6 is indeed wonderful. It seems speedier to load the OS, load Activities, and shut down than previous versions. Kudos to Peter Robinson especially. Art Hunkins - Original Message - From: Thomas C Gilliard To: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org Cc: IAEP SugarLabs ; Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA cairo conversion

2011-11-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
I'm rebased on top of mainline now, staged at the usual place. I'll continue working on getting the GTK3 functional while leaving GTK2 operation unchanged. --scott --       ( http://cscott.net ) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA cairo conversion

2011-11-10 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: I'm rebased on top of mainline now, staged at the usual place.  I'll continue working on getting the GTK3 functional while leaving GTK2 operation unchanged. +1 I'll do some testing; I plan to make the next release

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA cairo conversion

2011-11-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I'll do some testing; I plan to make the next release based on this work. May as well get these bits into the field. I'm mostly just concerned that future patches base off the converted source and use the new

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v7?

2011-11-10 Thread Walter Bender
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, So there's no rest for the wicked its time to think about what you would like to develop for SoaS v7. I know upstream is all very busy already the sugar team are full pelt into the conversion of sugar

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New Dextrose-3 development release: Alpha-3

2011-11-10 Thread Anish Mangal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm pleased to announce another development release in the dextrose-3 series. This is our third alpha and builds upon sugar-0.94.1 and a new dextrose patchset. The targeted release date for the final stable release is 19th December. Please see

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA cairo conversion

2011-11-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
Current version on the cscott-gtk3 branch works on GTK3. Some functionality might be missing: I've just discovered a bug in the gir bindings for gtk_pixmap_get_pixels() which makes 'read pixel' break in gtk3, for instance. GTK2 operation should have no regressions. (Testing welcome!) --scott

[Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Hewitt
I'm finally starting to investigate networking on my XOs. I have two XO 1s - Firmware Q2E45 Wireless 5.110.22.p23 Sugar .84.16 Build 852 Let's call them G (good) B (bad) The neighbourhood show three mesh symbols on both. On G one pulses but on B ... no pulsing. G finally says Connected on

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 12:08 +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: I'm finally starting to investigate networking on my XOs. I have two XO 1s - Firmware Q2E45 Wireless 5.110.22.p23 Sugar .84.16 Build 852 Let's call them G (good) B (bad) The neighbourhood show three mesh symbols on both. On G one

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Hewitt
ok test net nothing on B on G: RSSI: 0 SSID: Channel: 1 RSSI: 49 SSID: Channel: 1 At 01:17 PM 11/11/2011, Jerry Vonau wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 12:08 +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: I'm finally starting to investigate networking on my XOs. I have two XO 1s - Firmware Q2E45 Wireless

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:47:10PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: ok test net nothing on B Does the wireless LED blink during this test? Does the test take about two seconds? If yes to both questions, perhaps an antenna cable has come lose or broken. Try it right next to your access point. If

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Hewitt
At 01:55 PM 11/11/2011, James Cameron wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:47:10PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: ok test net nothing on B Does the wireless LED blink during this test? Yes Does the test take about two seconds? Yes And ... I have now discovered the command test /wlan which

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:22:53PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: At 01:55 PM 11/11/2011, James Cameron wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:47:10PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: ok test net nothing on B Does the wireless LED blink during this test? Yes Does the test take about two seconds?

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Hewitt
One further piece of info before answering your questions: ifconfig on B has NO inet addr line - otherwise appears ok (apart from the previously mention lack of an eth0 entry). At 02:34 PM 11/11/2011, James Cameron wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:22:53PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: At

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:54:33PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: One further piece of info before answering your questions: ifconfig on B has NO inet addr line - otherwise appears ok (apart from the previously mention lack of an eth0 entry). At 02:34 PM 11/11/2011, James Cameron wrote: I'm

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Hewitt
At 03:09 PM 11/11/2011, James Cameron wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:54:33PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: One further piece of info before answering your questions: ifconfig on B has NO inet addr line - otherwise appears ok (apart from the previously mention lack of an eth0 entry). At

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:23:25PM +1000, Peter Hewitt wrote: Ad-hoc Network 1 only appears on G and then only if I have an XO 1.5 switched on. Okay, so hardware is working, firmware is working, some of the software is working. I suggest next you gain manual control over networking and see if

Re: [Sugar-devel] A network question

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Hewitt
Not exactly as per your instructions but I think equivalent. And I assume it should be sudo ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.1 not sudo iwconfig eth0 10.0.0.1 Seeing I had an established ad-hoc network I just configured the bad computer and made sure the inet addr line agreed with the other two