Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Here's OLPC's mission, as a reminder: Mission Statement: To create educational opportunities for the world's poorest children by providing each child with a rugged, low-cost, low-power, connected laptop with content and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:10:40AM -0700, Sameer Verma wrote: [...] We are seeing continued adoption of the XO in Rwanda (I hear Rwanda is 1.75, but not 4) and Australia. [...] I can confirm that Rwanda is using XO-1.75, not XO-4. You can find this information, albeit without quantities, in

Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
The patch looks fine to me. I'm not sure the all caps ATTENTION is necessary but if you want to keep it s/ATENTION/ATTENTION. And let's add the comment about gtk2 we discussed before. Feel free to push with these changes. On 30 October 2013 15:27, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Today

Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

2013-10-31 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Was already pushed by manuq. Gonzalo On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: The patch looks fine to me. I'm not sure the all caps ATTENTION is necessary but if you want to keep it s/ATENTION/ATTENTION. And let's add the comment about gtk2 we discussed

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations

2013-10-31 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Sameer I've tried to sit on my hands in this discussion. I agree with your assessment completely. I had the opportunity to talk with Ruben Rodriguez at the sprint. He has Sugar running (under Ubuntu) on a Nexus 7 and on a standard PC. I have one of each to test this. The Nexus 7 together

[Sugar-devel] JAMediaEditor

2013-10-31 Thread Flavio Danesse
Bueno, luego de muchos meses de trabajo con Cristian y Nacho, tenemos la primera versión de JAMediaEditor para Sugar y Gnome. Esta aplicación se basa en trabajos previos realizados entre Activity Central y Batoví Games Studio. *Dentro de las características más interesantes del editor, (desde mi

[Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot is new for both users and developers, see the release notes http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes Sources: http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.100.0.tar.xz

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

2013-10-31 Thread Walter Bender
Bravo!! Great job. -walter On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot is new for both users and developers, see the release notes http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes Sources:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Arch Linux XO image and Sugar packages

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi Christophe, sorry for the delay. I haven't tried your packages yet because being a developer I prefer to work from git master... though it's great to have stable packages for Arch of course! Now that 0.100 is out you should be able to get rid of the python2 sed stuff simplifying the PKGBUILDs

[Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.102 schedule

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, here is the proposed schedule for 0.102 0.101.0 - 12/01/13 0.101.1 - 01/01/14 0.101.2 - 02/01/14 0.101.3 - 03/01/14 - Feature freeze 0.101.4 - 04/01/14 - String, UI, API freeze 0.102.0 - 05/01/14 - Final release I entered it in trac already. http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/roadmap Thoughts?

[Sugar-devel] 0.100 branch

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, I created stable branches for 0.100, called sucrose-0.100 following the usual naming scheme. I suggest we decide if and when to make more stable releases as we go. Basically just send patches for the branch or push new translations to pootle and request a release on the mailing list when

[Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, as for 0.100 I suggest we have an early discussion on what the focus of the release should be. Exception could be made down the road but in general we should try to stick to the plan. Here is my proposal 1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the quality of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 29 October 2013 20:29, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.comwrote: Phase two -- Let's look at lessons learned from other projects. We can focus on the road map and product specification. From my experience, these two piece can provide an anchor for the rest of the project: 1. The act

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, as for 0.100 I suggest we have an early discussion on what the focus of the release should be. Exception could be made down the road but in general we should try to stick to the plan. Here is my proposal 1

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 1 November 2013 02:01, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: 1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the quality of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud of. Let's try to fix that for 0.102. Be nice to get a discussion going about

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release FotoToon-17

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi Iain, just wanted to mention the testing you are doing is really useful. Please keep it up! On 29 October 2013 00:04, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote: On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:19 -0400, Sugar Labs Activities wrote: Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.100 Download Now:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

2013-10-31 Thread Dr. Gerald Ardito
This is really impressive. Congratulations! Gerald On Oct 31, 2013 8:45 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot is new for both users and developers, see the release notes http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 November 2013 02:01, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: 1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the quality of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud of.

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 1 November 2013 02:18, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: 1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the quality of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud of. Let's try to fix that for 0.102. Be nice to get a discussion

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 November 2013 02:18, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: 1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the quality of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:18:42PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: Not sure there is too much more overhead for writing a wiki page vs writing an email. I don't recall hearing anything concrete about the feature proposal process recently. It has be refactored periodically, usually under the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Here's OLPC's mission, as a reminder: Mission Statement: To create educational opportunities for the world's poorest children by providing each

Re: [Sugar-devel] 0.102 focus and features

2013-10-31 Thread Anish Mangal
I may be incorrect, but I think the way it happened (during 0.88-94 days) was a feature was first proposed on the mailing list with the [FEATURE] tag in the subject line. It was then extensively discussed, and then at some later point a wiki page was created, which was (supposed to be) useful at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote: Here's OLPC's mission, as a reminder: Mission Statement: To create

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 1 November 2013 03:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 October 2013 19:31, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.100.0 (stable)

2013-10-31 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Congratulations to all the team! Gonzalo On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Dr. Gerald Ardito gerald.ard...@gmail.com wrote: This is really impressive. Congratulations! Gerald On Oct 31, 2013 8:45 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we are proud to announce the release

Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

2013-10-31 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/10/31 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: The patch looks fine to me. I'm not sure the all caps ATTENTION is necessary but if you want to keep it s/ATENTION/ATTENTION. And let's add the comment about gtk2 we discussed before. Feel free to push with these changes. Yes, I pushed it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread John Watlington
On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:04 AM, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com wrote: I just wanted to bump this line of questions as, it is the critical set of questions which will determine the future viability of Sugar. If anyone as more

[Sugar-devel] Thanks

2013-10-31 Thread John Watlington
Since I finally mentioned that OLPC and I had parted ways in an earlier email, I really need to thank the OLPC community for providing me with the opportunity to work with you for the past seven years. Reuben continues to provide outstanding deployment support for all XO laptops, and I will

Re: [Sugar-devel] Private vs Public conversations.

2013-10-31 Thread Laura Vargas
Indeed, deployments (both administrators and users) have much to contribute to Sugar and the XO's community. The challenge here was how to get and manage such tremendous amount of feedback? Back in November of 2011, we (the Peruvian Local Lab) made an open call to the community addressing this