It would be great to get the mentors together one more time to discuss
the results of the program: what worked, what didn't, how we can
ensure the work gets upstreamed, what we can improve upon next time.
Student feedback is most welcome as well.
I propose a meeting (#sugar-meeting on
Gonzalo's question seems to suggest that the dependency on
sugar-cp-background should be declared by the sugar package spec file.
I disagree. I think it should be a decision by deployment team.
Yes. That is the reason I asked.
Anyway, no problem from my part if the rpm is added by default
Hello everyone,
We are in the process of updating the feature proposals list for Sugar
0.104 [1]. We will use this list in the next development meeting to start
revising features.
If you are working on something and want it included in 0.104, please make
sure to put your feature page in that
Done.
Add Cordova container feature.
Lionel
2014-09-02 17:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone,
We are in the process of updating the feature proposals list for Sugar
0.104 [1]. We will use this list in the next development meeting to start
I don't care one way or the other how you guys configure
olpc-os-builder, but as a Sugar platform contributor, I think sugar
packages should come with all the bells and whistles included, and if
any deployment wants to chop and censor functionality, then it should
be their problem, not the
== Sugar Digest ==
I took the summer off from blogging, hence I have a lot to report
about the exciting progress we've made of the past three months.
First, congratulations to our ten participants in Google Summer of Code:
Project Student Mentor
Music Suite Aneesh Dogra
On September 2, 2014 at 11:54 AM Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
I don't care one way or the other how you guys configure
olpc-os-builder, but as a Sugar platform contributor, I think sugar
packages should come with all the bells and whistles included, and if
any
This take it or leave it attitude that is displayed here is the reason
myself and Dextrose(Activity Central) came into being part of the ecosystem
in the first place, for the needs of the deployment. We listened to what
the deployment wanted to do and worked towards that goal.
I guess that
Great. Date?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be great to get the mentors together one more time to discuss
the results of the program: what worked, what didn't, how we can
ensure the work gets upstreamed, what we can improve upon next
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
G'day German,
Perhaps Gonzalo was asking, in your two builds, which version of the
sugar- package was chosen by olpc-os-builder?
sudo rpm -q sugar
Gonzalo's question seems to suggest that the dependency on
Sorry. I meant to say Friday, Sept 5.
-walter
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Great. Date?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be great to get the mentors together one more time to discuss
the
Works for me :)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry. I meant to say Friday, Sept 5.
-walter
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Great. Date?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Walter Bender
Ok, I will be there too.
Gonzalo
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Martin Abente
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
Works for me :)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry. I meant to say Friday, Sept 5.
-walter
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at
Hi Jerry,
As I've not had the pleasure of working with you directly and I have
never been an OLPC associate, whatever that is, and, to my knowledge,
there is no such thing as a Sugar Labs associate, therefore I don't
feel offended by your (perceived) aggressive tone, so I hope it was not
On 09/02/2014 01:49 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
Hi Jerry,
As I've not had the pleasure of working with you directly and I have
never been an OLPC associate, whatever that is, and, to my knowledge,
there is no such thing as a Sugar Labs associate, therefore I don't
feel offended by your
Just a few points:
* If anybody want install all the control-panel sections, can install
sugar-cp-all.
* You can install all sugar with yum install @sugar-desktop sugar-runner
[1]
If there are some dependency not working, is a bug, and we can try to solve
it.
As a example, I filled this ticket
Hi Sam,
Sorry for the delay
Thanks for adding the feature page. Do you want add it to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Feature_List#Proposed_Features_for_0.104
?
I think the site looks better (anyway as I said, I am not a designer...)
Will add the hooks in github soon, to have more data to
what a fun time we've had, eh? ;-)
i agree with sebastian on a monolithic sugar rpm; provided there is an
easy way to disable components not required by a user. i dislike
having many packages for what is, on the face of it, a single desktop
solution.
i agree with jerry that making such a
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:17:48PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
What is really handy to have for debugging is a copy of the master
kickstart file used at image creation time. This file has the order
of the scriptlets that are used in os-builder, and presents a nice
play by play of the whole build
Amazing work Sam !
+1
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Hi Sam,
Sorry for the delay
Thanks for adding the feature page. Do you want add it to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Feature_List#Proposed_Features_for_0.104
?
I think the site
20 matches
Mail list logo
