Sugar 0.114 is released, with a few fixes.
Downloads;
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.114.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.114.tar.xz
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 07:09:44PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> James, I may have a patch (if I can find it) to the WeDo activity
> that I used to maintain with a major speed up. I'll try to dig it
> up. Or were you using the WeDo plugin?
Neither, sorry. The state government equipment kit
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:58 PM James Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:00:07AM -0400, Jeff Elkner wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick responses, Chihurumnaya and James! Yes,
> > pressing F3 did the trick.
>
> Yay!
>
> > I should have remembered that from my OLPC days, but it has been so
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:00:07AM -0400, Jeff Elkner wrote:
> Thanks for the quick responses, Chihurumnaya and James! Yes,
> pressing F3 did the trick.
Yay!
> I should have remembered that from my OLPC days, but it has been so
> long since I've used Sugar. Incidentally, I had forgotten that
Yes. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:19:10PM -0400, Jeff Elkner wrote:
> Should I file an issue to add libgli2.0-dev as a dependency to the
> sugar-browse-activity package? If so, where?
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:15 PM Jeff Elkner wrote:
> >
> > It did!
Should I file an issue to add libgli2.0-dev as a dependency to the
sugar-browse-activity package? If so, where?
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:15 PM Jeff Elkner wrote:
>
> It did! ;-)
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:09 PM Alex Perez wrote:
> >
> > There are two errors in this log file:
> >
> > sh: 1:
There are two errors in this log file:
sh: 1: glib-compile-schemas: not found
and
gi.repository.GLib.Error: g-file-error-quark: Failed to open file
“/home/jelkner/.sugar/default/org.laptop.WebActivity/data/schemas/gschemas.compiled”:
open() failed: No such file or directory (4)
|Try sudo
I've attached the file. ~ Jeff
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:41 AM Chihurumnaya Ibiam
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:00 PM Jeff Elkner wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick responses, Chihurumnaya and James! Yes,
>> pressing F3 did the trick. I should have remembered that from my OLPC
>>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:00 PM Jeff Elkner wrote:
> Thanks for the quick responses, Chihurumnaya and James! Yes,
> pressing F3 did the trick. I should have remembered that from my OLPC
> days, but it has been so long since I've used Sugar. Incidentally, I
> had forgotten that I lent my last
Jeff,
Jeff Elkner wrote on 5/17/19 8:00 AM:
...vreveals that the latest Sugar update for my XO's will be running
Ubuntu18.04, but also that it has the same issues I'm seeing in the
Debian Sid VM with Metacity, I guess?
No, OLPC OS 18.04 will not flash to Any original XO (XO-1, XO-1.5,
Thanks for the quick responses, Chihurumnaya and James! Yes,
pressing F3 did the trick. I should have remembered that from my OLPC
days, but it has been so long since I've used Sugar. Incidentally, I
had forgotten that I lent my last two XO4's to a former student so
that he could experiment
Aniket, I've refined the native environment instructions after testing
on Fedora 30 and Ubuntu 19.04. I've made a pull request here;
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/830
It is a hybrid configuration, which may leave a copy of the downstream
Sugar packages in /usr, and our latest HEAD in
It is a wicked problem. Here are my thoughts;
1. there are three temporal scopes of dependency; build time, run
time, and those for downloaded activities,
2. our activity bundle specification doesn't list dependencies, so we
had early assumptions about what would be available,
3. some of
13 matches
Mail list logo
