Hey all,
I was wondering if we had some statistics on the most popular / used
activities. I am trying to look into implementing features / fixing issues
for activities for GSoC (and in general) and want to make sure what I'm
working on has a greater impact rather than focusing on smaller less
Welome Jui,
Your message was rejected by the mailing list for being too large. We
have 620 subscribers to the mailing list, and forwarding a large
message to all of them, especially when most of them don't want to
look at the attachments, can damage us all. Please upload any videos
and provide
Thanks.
I'm tracking this as
https://github.com/sugarlabs/write-activity/issues/38
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:03:37PM +, shaansubbaiah.c...@bmsce.ac.in wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I have tried the other activities and the only the text editor has this issue.
> I'll download the package source
You could either;
- upgrade to a later release, or
- install a virtual machine.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:14:20PM +0100, Massabe Lydiane wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> I checked this repository;
> [1]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/ubuntu.md
> but there are no commands to
Hello James,
I checked this repository;
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/ubuntu.md
but there are no commands to install sugar on my operating system which is
Ubuntu 16.04.
Please what can I do?
Regards
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:52 PM James Cameron wrote:
> For Sugarizer
Hi James,
I have tried the other activities and the only the text editor has this issue.
I'll download the package source and find out the issue if possible.
BestShaan
On Monday, March 9, 2020, 3:32:38 AM GMT+5:30, James Cameron
wrote:
Thanks Shaan.
In the context of 'Debian
Hi Abhishek,
Thanks for your interest in SugarLabs and Sugarizer.
You're welcome to communicate by mail with me and other mentors (Ashish and
Michaël, both in CC) on Sugarizer projects.
BTW I suggest you to choose one of this project because it's more than
unlikely that you could be able to
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Rahul kohli wrote:
> Sir I am working on one of this year's Proposed GSoC idea (Exporting code
> in MusicBlocks)
>
OK. So when you were referring to Turtle Blocks, you were referring to the
Python code. The block format is actually quite similar, but I suspect
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:09 AM Rahul kohli wrote:
>
> On Mon 9 Mar, 2020, 6:46 PM Walter Bender,
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:40 AM Rahul kohli wrote:
>>
>>> Do they use the same strategy of primitive of a block with function of
>>> the block and its arguments
>>>
>>
>> Yes. But
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:40 AM Rahul kohli wrote:
> Do they use the same strategy of primitive of a block with function of the
> block and its arguments
>
Yes. But the underlying code in Music Blocks has undergone a major
restructuring. That has not be merged in Turtle Blocks yet.
>
> On Mon,
Turtle Blocks is lagging a bit behind Music Blocks at the moment. But in
theory, they are the same under the hood. Just a different collection of
blocks.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:34 AM Rahul kohli wrote:
> Is Musicblocks following the same approach for blocks creation as
> TurtleBlocks
>
Is Musicblocks following the same approach for blocks creation as
TurtleBlocks
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
12 matches
Mail list logo
