On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
Well, if we decide that future releases of Sugar should run ok on the
next major release of CentOS, we cannot depend on later versions of
python, gtk, etc.
I'm not sure something like sugar which is (and should be) fast moving
mixes well with
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Daniel Drake wrote:
I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary
LiveUSB distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS).
I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so there would be no
primary distro. But users/deployments may
Just a brief note: Douglas knows more about Fedora Live stuff than just
about anybody in the world -- his work was one of the original drivers of
the Fedora Live project. He's kinda the Godfather of the Fedora Live CD.
So thanks, Douglas. Good to see you helping these folks out.
--g
On
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Is there any interest in figuring out how assessments might work in a
Sugar activity API?
Teachers frequently talk about the need to assess the progress of their
pupils. In the context of an activity, how do teachers do that? I
don't think there's
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
2009/6/15 Maria Droujkova droujk...@gmail.com:
David,
For frameworks, you may want to look at achievement systems and
reputation systems (e.g. karma on slashdot). I just helped a
colleague with his grant proposal about adding achievement systems to
Hello folks.
Is there any interest in figuring out how assessments might work in a
Sugar activity API?
Teachers frequently talk about the need to assess the progress of their
pupils. In the context of an activity, how do teachers do that? I don't
think there's a clear mechanism, and I
We're getting close to release of 0.84, and we can still use some focused
testing.
Testing is a lot more fun, and effective, when you do it with friends.
(Collaboration testing absolutely requires it.) So if you have time,
*please* join us on Monday and Tuesday. The developers will all show
+1 to activities.sl.o.
Seems like a pretty strong vote. :)
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Eben Eliason wrote:
+1 for activities from me, as well.
Addons makes it sound
Should these perhaps be going to Fedora-olpc list as well?
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, build...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of
erikos ran an awesome meeting. My notes on what I think the purpose
should be:
First Goal. To go through all UNCONFIRMED bug reports and determine:
* whether the bug report is a dupe. if so, close as Duplicate.
* whether the bug report is missing key info. if so, ask questions in bug
and
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Edward Cherlin wrote:
Is anybody going to PyCon? We have booth space and could use coders
and mentors for the sprints.
I will be there.
--g
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
Dear Sugar team,
I've been very confused (and frankly, significantly angered) by recent
remarks that I've encountered both in person (e.g. from Bernie) and in
#sugar
12 matches
Mail list logo
