Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:40 AM Alex Perez wrote: > > There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso > which I have confirmed is working as expected. > > The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size. Great, do we know why/how this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Announcement: Sugar on a Stick (SoaS) 34 released today

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:42 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Folks, > > Fedora 34 was released today, which means that we've got a new release > of Sugar on a Stick 34, which includes Sugar 0.118, and can be > downloaded from: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Call for testing of Fedora 34 beta Sugar On A Stick

> This is a call for testing of the upcoming Fedora 34 based Sugar on a Stick, > which is now ready for testing on the following platforms: > > For 64-bit PCs, the ISO can be downloaded from: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > SOAS was failing to build in F34 due to telepathy-salut being deprecated and > needed as a dependency in sugar, F33 beta had an issue where startup goes > straight to login. > > Both have been fixed after today's

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick is available now!

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > > Fedora 32 has been released, and the Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick spin is > available for download from https://bit.ly/F32-SoAS-x86_64-ISO. It is 950 > megabytes in size. > > The 32-bit Fedora SoaS ARM image, suitable for use on Raspberry Pi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick beta ISO ready for testing

> Fedora 32 has entered beta state, and the Sugar on a Stick beta ISO (size is > 1 gigabyte) can be downloaded from http://bit.ly/SoaS-F32-Beta-ISO > > One known issue is that the IRC activity fails to start, and can not be used, > as it's not yet been ported to Python 3. There's currently 4

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...] > > > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...] > > > > > > As far as I can see all those deps are there. > > > > > > I see the following crash: > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): [...] > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, ideally should be > > ported to python 3. > > No, v41 is Python 3 already, and should work. Does work on Ubuntu > 20.04 beta. Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. > > The dependencies are unusual for this activity; check

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

'd like to know > how applying patches works. Thanks. How do you apply patches without packaging? Please read the Fedora docs on packaging: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> &

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

hem pre-beta and I've since had radio silence since. This has other implications because I will need assistance in the move to python3 from a packaging PoV as I really don't have the time any more to do this all on my own. Peter > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:10:08AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora 31

Hi All, Just a reminder we're in final freeze for Fedora 31, I'm assuming people are testing it. Just a reminder you can get the latest nightly composes here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-31/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] The plan moving forward for SoaS with Fedora 31 and Fedora 32

gt; Thanks. Interesting. > > > Forwarded Message > > Subject: Re: Packages in Fedora > >Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:02:59 +0100 > >From: Peter Robinson > > To: Alex Perez > > Hi Alex, > > > > > Thanks for reaching out. I am worki

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] F30 ARM (Raspberry Pi) SoaS not working, but a fix exists..

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:16 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > James Cameron wrote on 5/19/19 3:50 PM: > > That's unfortunate. > Agreed, but it was due to a lack of testing. > > > > Were the Fedora 30 ARM builds being tested before release? > They were, but only in QEMU, it would seem. The temporary

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 30 SoaS (Sugar on A Stick) final released

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:07 PM Walter Bender wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Alex Perez wrote: >> >> The Fedora 30 release was earlier today, and with it comes the Fedora 30 >> Sugar on a Stick environment, which now has functional collaboration, out of >> the box. It includes

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 30 (Release Candidate 1) SoaS images ready for testing

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:28 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Folks, > > > Just under the wire, we have managed to get some critical Sugar on a Stick > issues fixed, which are now included in Fedora 30 SoaS images. I would like > to extend a very special thanks to Peter Robins

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration Between Activities Fail

You might want to check the local firewall ports On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:09 PM Samson Goddy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > We've been working on installing SOAS on some computers in a school and we > were testing collaboration using CAT5 cables connected to a router > and also connected to the two

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Errors from Soas 29

Have you applied all the latest updates to Fedora, a number of issues have been fixed with Fedora 29 updates. Peter On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:52 AM Samson Goddy wrote: > Hello, > > Ibiam and I are currently working to install Sugar in the classroom, so we > decided to download Soas 32-bit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hey James, Happy New Year! > > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. > > > > >> Are there any plans to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Help soas is not building in fedora30 rawhide

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:41 PM James Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:23:44PM -0500, Frederick Grose wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:03 PM Thomas Gilliard > > wrote: > > > > > > Helpsoas is not building in fedora30 rawhide > > > > The livemedia.log shows this error

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

> > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > > > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 > > > > Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been > > retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not > > 100% sure that is the case but we might need to change

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:11 PM Frederick Grose wrote: > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not 100% sure that is the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > > > later. > > > > > > St

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > later. > > Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject > introspection for Telepathy. > > There's still no Python 3 support for the static

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > >> that still depend on it. Clo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

>> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. >> Are there any plans to move them to gst1? > > They were moved. Check the release

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:43 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:26:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: >> Hi all, >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Peter, >> > >> > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 >> > >> > 2) There

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hello All, This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback. I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major problem, we glue it together when it breaks etc. Kalpa has done a good job keeping most of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 28 SoaS

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:00 AM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:31:39PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> We're in Beta freeze for Fedora 28. > > Thanks for the update. > > Our How To install Sugar on Fedora is here; > https://g

[Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 28 SoaS

Hi All, We're in Beta freeze for Fedora 28. We have Sugar 0.112, there's nightly images for the various architectures at the URLs below. Please test so we don't end up in a situation like last cycle where people were testing at the last moment before release.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:50 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Pete

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-) > > Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing. > > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

ther. It would be useful to document though what the missing functionality is. I suspect some of it might just come out of the box with some of the newer gst 1 functionality though. Peter > -walter > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >&

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

FYI. We'll likely need these converted over in the F-26 cycle or drop them. I think the hardest to migrate would be record. sugar-clock sugar-memorize sugar-record sugar-speak -- Forwarded message -- From: Michael Cronenworth Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:06 PM

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Alpha!

Hi All, Fedora 24 Alpha is out with sugar 0.108.1 in SoaS. Please test! Of particular note of this release we have all the core bits to fix collaboration so now is the time to fix your Activity and release a new version (with tar ball please!) so we can finally put this issue to bed. What would

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.2 release (API, UI and Strings freeze)

> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> > I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.107.2 (unstable). This >> > release means that we have reached the API, UI and Strings freeze >> > deadline >&g

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.2 release (API, UI and Strings freeze)

> I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar 0.107.2 (unstable). This > release means that we have reached the API, UI and Strings freeze deadline > [1] and that we should focus on making sure there are no missing > translations or exceptional bugs left. > > This release comes with the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.1 release (feature freeze)

TL;DR All activities need to be ported, and there will be a very small > toolkit change. The toolkit change has not yet landed. Is it still planned for 0.107? > Thanks, > Sam > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >&

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.1 release (feature freeze)

Hi Martin, > Moving forward with our current development cycle, I am pleased to announce > the release of Sugar 0.107.1 (unstable). This release means that we have > officially passed the time [1] for including new features and that we must > start focusing on stability and bug fixing. > > This

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.1 release (feature freeze)

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Martin Abente wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Moving forward with our current development cycle, I am pleased to announce > the release of Sugar 0.107.1 (unstable). This release means that we have > officially passed the time [1] for

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] UNSTABLE 0.107.0 release

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Sam P. wrote: > Hi Peter, > > For porting browse activity, we need upstream changes. Part of them are > written, but not the bindings. We need a new api to save and restore state. > I should chase that up at some point. > > Otherwise, the port

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Release Compose 2 (RC2) Available Now!

Hi All, This could be the GA release for SoaS, please test. https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC2/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-SoaS-x86_64-23-2.iso https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_RC2/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-23-2.iso

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Beta Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

Hi All, Fedora 23 Beta RC1 with SoaS is out, the login issue is fixed, please test test test. Direct download links: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Beta_RC1/Live/i386/Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-23_Beta-1.iso

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:46 AM, David Leeming wrote: > Hi, > > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years old but was > a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run SOAS. It never > completes booting, you go through the name, colour,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

en it's expected it can be fixed. Peter > Best, > > David Leeming > Solomon Islands > > -Original Message- > From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org > [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 20

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

>> So to briefly restate. >> >> Problem: Sugar does not start on F23. >> >> Diagnosis: the shared library libsugarext.so.0 cannot be loaded, >> because of a missing symbol, yet the symbol can be found with >> strings(1). >> >> Workaround #1: use F22 packages. >> >> Workaround #2: use Martin's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On 4 Sep 2015 00:22, "Martin Abente" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM, James Cameron wrote: >> >> The errors complain of missing symbols; >> >> - sugar_event_controller_get_state >> >> - acme_volume_alsa_new >> >> Which were both

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

>> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64. >> >> So did I using my copr account, what a great tool to build rpms with, >> perhaps SL should go back to using it.[1] Easy for testers to enable with >> dnf. >> >> > It works >> > fine, so it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

>> > > Hello everyone, >> > > >> > > I rebuilt 0.106.0 packages from fc23 source rpms, for fc22 x86_64. >> > >> > So did I using my copr account, what a great tool to build rpms with, >> > perhaps SL should go back to using it.[1] Easy for testers to enable >> > with >> > dnf. >> > >> > > It works

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

s this? > Do you know if there are changes on alsa or is not available on Soas? No changes I'm aware of, and it's available. > Gonzalo > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jerry Vonau

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jerry Vonau <m...@jvonau.ca> wrote: > Adding Soas maintainer Peter Robinson I'm on the mailing list, you _REALLY_ don't need to add me separately! >> Urgent Request: >> >> SoaS in fedora 23 still is unusable.[1] [2] >> also

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

Hi David, I'm the SoaS maintainer. I want to demonstrate SOAS to teachers in Vanuatu. I would like to be more useful, but actually don't have the luxury of time to research these arcane technical issues in which I am not an expert. I just want to know, is there a version of SOAS that is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Delaying 0.106 for one week

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I am strongly considering to delay the 0.106 release by one week, from June 29 to July 6 [1]. The reasons for this delay are: Aymara translations are very close to be fully completed, _very_

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Fedora 22 is here!

Hi All, Fedora 22, and by association, Sugar on a Stick 22 is now available. To go along with the new SoaS release we have a spiffy new site too. https://spins.fedoraproject.org/en/soas/ Full details about the Fedora 22 release is below. Thanks to all for their assistance and hard work in this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar all-hands meeting

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: I know there have been various board and development meetings for Sugar. But I would like to propose having an all-hands meeting where anyone in the Sugar community as well as related groups (deployments,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 15:00 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Peter, On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

. Peter, when need this be finished? Gonzalo On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Final Release Compose 1 (RC1) Available Now!

Hi All, We're in the last stretch so we're now down to critical fixes. Please test and let me know ASAP. Peter https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_RC1/Images/armhfp/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-22-1-sda.raw.xz

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

, if it is required. Iain Peter, when need this be finished? Gonzalo On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 15:00 +0100

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

_Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_. Thanks, Gonzalo, is good advice. I've just spent two hours manually providing updates. It will be live on staging shortly. Please provide any further updates against that. Right the new updated content is live on staging. Please

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

:40 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: _Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_. Thanks, Gonzalo, is good advice. I've just spent two hours manually providing updates. It will be live on staging shortly. Please provide any further updates against

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

at 12:38 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Walter sent some edits, I believe most of those have gone in, we need to update titles still I believe. This is what we currently have

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

Hi Peter, On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: Thanks, Sean, for the careful proof reading. Fair copy attached. I originally included

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter, On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: Thanks, Sean, for the careful proof reading

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 15:00 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Peter, On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Iain Brown

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

, May 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: It's already in process On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter, I think Walter send out a good copy [1] with headers - maybe we could use those headers? Thanks, Sam

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

, May 14, 2015 at 7:09 PM Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Sam, Gonzalo et el, I've worked with the Fedora web team to update it some based partially on Sam's

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Peter, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Sam, Gonzalo et el, I've worked with the Fedora web team to update it some based partially on Sam's details below. Details are here: http://spins.stg.fedoraproject.org/en

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

Hi Sam, Gonzalo et el, I've worked with the Fedora web team to update it some based partially on Sam's details below. Details are here: http://spins.stg.fedoraproject.org/en/soas/ Let me know of any feedback, I personally think it looks really fab! Peter On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Sam

Re: [Sugar-devel] f22-spins page is being written and needs suggestions

See the post I just sent to the list less than a hour ago :-) Thanks Sean, Peter On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tom, Gonzalo had mentioned this, I have a rewrite of the introduction in the works and Sam's Activity texts are good. The main issue is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities Collaboration on SoaS 22

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 1:47 AM, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote: I managed to test Sugar on Fedora 22 release (SoaS 22). Looking good. However I have not been able to get activities working on collaboration mode - memorize, write, record, etc. Wonder if this is my problem ? I believe it's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:10 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think we should try make a build using CentOS. I don't know if have all the packages we need, but the rate of change in Fedora was difficult to follow when

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

Hi All, We're getting to the pointy end of the Fedora 22 release and hence SoaS 22. Below are links to the latest images. Please test. I've seen there's a new Read out (why aren't announcement about new Activites going to list anymore?) but all others should be on latest releases. I look

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: The obvious counterargument would be that a deployment might want to deploy your XO-Next (whatever it is) alongside existing XO laptops, allowing all of them to have the same configuration. From my memory of

[Sugar-devel] Read 115 issues

Hi All, I see there's a new Read 115 release. What's changed? The tarball has gone from 74K for v114 to 498K for v115, that's quite a jump! Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Read 115 issues

images. Certainly do not have sense use the little space in the xos in this way. Sam, are you taking the images from git or how are you doing? Gonzalo On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I see there's a new Read 115 release. What's changed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Server-devel] Fedora Flock Conference

Are we planning to do anything with Sugar at the Fedora Flock Conference (August 12-15, Rochester NY - www.flocktofedora.org) this year? The call for talks just ended although it might be possible to sneak one in. The call for papers is open until May 2, 2015:

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO Fedora 22 Beta work

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked out: olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja.

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO Fedora 22 Beta work

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld sam...@greenfeld.org wrote: At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] telepathy-gabble and collaboration

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Peter, A few days ago, I figured out why Sugar collaboration is broken when connected to a Jabber server since Fedora 20. To summarize: since telepathy-gabble 0.17.25, the Tubes API was deprecated and

Re: [Sugar-devel] XO-1 vs Sugar 0.104 performance, and swap to NAND Flash

On 07/04/15 22:47, James Cameron wrote: The testing scripts can be made available if anybody else would like to replicate the results. I'd be curious to look at your scripts and try to replicate some results with our builds. git clone

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

Hi All, The Fedora 22 Beta RC is out, would be great to get some testing on SoAS/Sugar 0.104 -- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org Date: Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:04 AM Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now! To:

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

as well. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Looking at the GSoC 2015 idea page [1] I'm wondering if it's possible to get some other core items added as part of the sugar core projects? Like: * Covert Record to gtk3 / gstreamer 1 * Covert TamTam

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Release] Announcing Sugar 0.104.1 (stable)

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, After a few a days of delay [1], I am pleased to announce the the release of Sugar 0.104.1. On their way to F-22+, they should be in F-22 updates-testing tomorrow. Peter

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 22 Alpha!

Hi All, Fedora 22 Alpha is out. Please test SoaS v22 :-) There's a few minor known issues: * Obviously 0.104.1 isn't in it just yet [1] :-) * gabble and salut are missing, to fix: sudo yum install telepathy-gabble telepathy-salut on the command line. This is already fixed and will be in the

[Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

Hi All, Looking at the GSoC 2015 idea page [1] I'm wondering if it's possible to get some other core items added as part of the sugar core projects? Like: * Covert Record to gtk3 / gstreamer 1 * Covert TamTam/Speak etc to CSound 6 Peter [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2015

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose (SoaS 22)

I normally get them from the QA announcements https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2015-February/125244.html On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: There are any place to get the last link? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin

[Sugar-devel] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose (SoaS 22)

Hi All, The first compose towards SoaS 22 is out [2][3][4]. I've done some very basic testing and there's problems even failing to start with the following Activities: * Terminal * Speak * Pippy * Ruler So if someone could look and see why that would be fab! Also there's a plan to move to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse-157?

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Looks like I will not have time to work on Write for a while.. If anybody want to check, the spec and patches used in the F18 rpm are here [1] In theory, all the patches should be already on abiword upstream, but

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release IRC-12

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Sugar Labs Activities activit...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4029 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.102 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/29078/irc-12.xo Release notes: 12 * Fixed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Release] Announcing Sugar 0.104.0 (stable)

I am pleased to announce the release of Sugar (sucrose) 0.104.0. This release includes new features and bug fixes from Google Code-In and Summer of Code students, deployments and community members. See the release notes: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.104/Notes Sources:

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on a Stick going forward for F-22 onwards

Hi All, With Fedora/SoaS 21 out for some time I think we have a good and stable release. Firstly I'd like to thank the awesome test effort to get a large chuck of testing done and fixes in for the deadline. Moving forward I'm happy to coordinate and deal with the release engineering side of

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar and python-dateutil in Fedora 22

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:15 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:43:10AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: The sugar toolkit (for both gtk2 and gtk3) uses python-dateutil and they're rebasing it from 1.5 to 2.x, would it be possible for someone to review to see

[Sugar-devel] sugar and python-dateutil in Fedora 22

Hi All, The sugar toolkit (for both gtk2 and gtk3) uses python-dateutil and they're rebasing it from 1.5 to 2.x, would it be possible for someone to review to see if there's any changes needed in the code please? Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183383 [2]

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] unstable 0.103.2 release and API, UI and String freeze.

On January 16, 2015 at 6:17 AM Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, These are the tarballs for the _last_ 0.103.x UNSTABLE release, and with this release we reach the API, UI and String freeze [1]. -

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Announcing] unstable 0.103.2 release and API, UI and String freeze.

To help with testing it would be nice if RPMS based on these versions could be made available via Fedora's updates-testing repo (or maybe koji) for F20-F21. We've never pushed new major releases of any sort to a stable Fedora release as there's too much QA and testing required and no

Re: [Sugar-devel] Modularized Sugar ready computer

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Anybody knows this? http://solenotebook.com/blog/ No, but looking at the close up of the mainboard it looks like it's based on an AllWinner A20 SoC ___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding the Sugar Labs Text to Speech feature.

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: What we need now is implement the same features already implemented with espeak: * List the voices available. * Select the voice * Be able to pause/continue/stop the playing. Other than that, we would need compare

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Physics-26

Can we have a tar ball release please? On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Sugar Labs Activities activit...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4193 Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.102 Download Now:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release TamTam Edit-68

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi Peter, This is strange: https://github.com/godiard/tamtam/blob/master/setup.py#L160 is adding usr after the prefix? It seems to be just ignoring any specified prefix and just using /usr no matter what. Peter

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >