On 30 November 2010 07:11, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Each GET, even if content is in the squid cache requires a remote HTTP
query to check for stale data in the cache. With the typical ping times
of 500-1000ms, you end up waiting a couple of seconds.
Sure, we could
On 29 November 2010 03:06, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
If the size were only needed at download time, then there would be no
need to perform a separate query: the size is already present in
Content-Length header.
I think Anish wants to know the size beforehand to show it in the
On 11/20/2010 06:59 AM, Anish Mangal wrote:
Hi,
I'm in process of developing an updater for sugar that reads urls (for
example [1]) which contain information in a format compliant with the
'activity microformat specification' [2].
Hi Anish,
so this would basically mean that the microformat
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 29 November 2010 03:06, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
If the size were only needed at download time, then there would be no
need to perform a separate query: the size is already present in
Content-Length
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.dewrote:
On 11/20/2010 06:59 AM, Anish Mangal wrote:
Hi,
I'm in process of developing an updater for sugar that reads urls (for
example [1]) which contain information in a format compliant with the
'activity microformat
On 11/29/2010 10:17 AM, Anish Mangal wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simon Schampijersi...@schampijer.dewrote:
On 11/20/2010 06:59 AM, Anish Mangal wrote:
Hi,
I'm in process of developing an updater for sugar that reads urls (for
example [1]) which contain information in a format
On 29 November 2010 09:16, Anish Mangal anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
In my little testing experience, this takes a lot more than 1-2 seconds for
a group of activities (such as this [1]).
But the only case in which you'd have to run so many queries would be
when you have *none* of those
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 08:18 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
OK. If it's really important to save 1-2 seconds of update time
From Paraguay it was more like 1-2 seconds per activity.
(on a
download thats then going to take probably more than a minute, perhaps
substantially more) I'd suggest just
On 20 November 2010 05:59, Anish Mangal anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in process of developing an updater for sugar that reads urls (for
example [1]) which contain information in a format compliant with the
'activity microformat specification' [2]. While writing the updater
code, I
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 23:03 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Activities are generally megabytes in size, or at least hundreds of
kilobytes. This transfer would follow the size query.
Your proposal would just shave off a handful of bytes.
If the size were only needed at download time, then there
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 07:23 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
You can try microformat ASLO updater from
http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/services/micro-format.php?name=fructose
Nice! I'm not sure about the size in KB... bytes would be more natural
for machine parsing, but kilobytes look better
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 07:23 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
You can try microformat ASLO updater from
http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/services/micro-format.php?name=fructose
Nice! I'm not sure about the size in
(oh, and the .zip file already has a checksum, it's not clear why
you'd need another one.)
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:51 -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I avoided doing this in the original specification because I meant the
microformat to be human-writable, and I didn't expect humans to be
able to reliably update these fields correctly.
The field is optional, though.
Besides, the
Excerpts from Anish Mangal's message of Sat Nov 20 06:59:36 +0100 2010:
Let's keep the discussion exclusively on sugar-devel, please.
Cross-posting can cause thread fragmentation. I also don't see any
value in discussing all Dextrose-related technical decisions on two
lists in parallel.
I've
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Anish Mangal's message of Sat Nov 20 06:59:36 +0100 2010:
Let's keep the discussion exclusively on sugar-devel, please.
Cross-posting can cause thread fragmentation. I also don't see any
Hi,
I'm in process of developing an updater for sugar that reads urls (for
example [1]) which contain information in a format compliant with the
'activity microformat specification' [2]. While writing the updater
code, I realized that I have to make lots of time and bandwidth
consuming http
17 matches
Mail list logo
