On 4 March 2012 16:35, S Page skierp...@gmail.com wrote:
@Tabitha, I made your template prominent in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_testing_template and continued the
archivist job of marking old stuff as {{obsolete|from 2008}}...
Thanks :-)
Is _anything_ under
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nz wrote:
On 4 March 2012 16:35, S Page skierp...@gmail.com wrote:
@Tabitha, I made your template prominent in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_testing_template and continued the
archivist job of marking old stuff as
oh, forgot to ask about karma as mentioned on
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Community_testing_meetings/2008-11-06/Displaying_testing_metrics_in_motivating_ways
On another project I help with (one netbook per child with Ubuntu and
municipal wifi, so some significant cross over) Tom set up
Hey all,
@Tabitha, I made your template prominent in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_testing_template and continued the
archivist job of marking old stuff as {{obsolete|from 2008}}...
Is _anything_ under http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Tests still a useful
test case? Maybe a mass delete or rename
On 03/03/2012 07:35 PM, S Page wrote:
Hey all,
@Tabitha, I made your template prominent in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_testing_template and continued the
archivist job of marking old stuff as {{obsolete|from 2008}}...
Is _anything_ under http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Tests still a useful
On 03/03/2012 08:51 PM, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
On 03/03/2012 07:35 PM, S Page wrote:
Hey all,
@Tabitha, I made your template prominent in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activity_testing_template and continued the
archivist job of marking old stuff as {{obsolete|from 2008}}...
Is _anything_
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
There are a few things I think need to be clarified:
What are we looking as a community to get out of this Fedora Test Day event?
What is the purpose of a test case and/or test plan? How detailed
should they be?
On 18 February 2012 21:04, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nz wrote:
On the topic of tracking testing, we have looked at a number of options here
in NZ and I think Australia also looked at a number of options.
We've recently hired a software test engineer and are developing a
workflow for
The Fedora community have compiled some informative analyses of their needs:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_requirements_proposal
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_use_cases
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tcms_Comparison
I think the wiki
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
srid...@laptop.org.auwrote:
On 18 February 2012 21:04, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nz wrote:
On the topic of tracking testing, we have looked at a number of options
here
in NZ and I think Australia also looked at a number of options.
On 17 February 2012 08:36, Samuel Greenfeld greenf...@laptop.org wrote:
On March 22 there will be a Sugar test day for Fedora 17. This means that
the Fedora community in general will be gathering to look at Sugar and see
what issues we have close to the end of the Sugar 0.96 cycle.
While
There are a few things I think need to be clarified:
1. What are we looking as a community to get out of this Fedora Test Day
event?
2. What is the purpose of a test case and/or test plan? How
detailed should they be? Presuming we want them, how should they be stored
in general,
On Feb 16, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
On March 22 there will be a Sugar test day for Fedora 17. This means that
the Fedora community in general will be gathering to look at Sugar and see
what issues we have close to the end of the Sugar 0.96 cycle.
March 22nd is a
Fedora test days historically have been Thursdays to help make it a regular
event that's easy to schedule around:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_17_test_days
If there is significant interest for another day of the week, we can
consider asking for it.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM,
The issue of using a dedicated software product to track test cases
results has come up from time to time.
The situation as I understand it is that OLPC in general prefers to use the
resources of other {often upstream} partners whenever possible. It is felt
by some people that we would spend
15 matches
Mail list logo
