0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here experimented with it?
Regards,
Michael
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here experimented with it?
Regards,
Michael
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is good reading about the general issues involved.
Has anyone here
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
http://www.osnews.com/story/16956/Decentralised_Installation_Systems
is
(Regarding 0install):
It is interesting, but fails horribly badly in the case of no, or low
bandwidth Internet.
I'm not convinced, for three reasons.
First, there is 0share
http://0install.net/0share.html
which seems to me to be remarkably similar to our long-stated goal of
horizontal
Hi Aleksey,
On 30 Aug 2009, at 01:23, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:51:22AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 30 Aug 2009, at 00:17, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:09:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
0install looks quite promising to me and
Gary C Martin wrote:
How many ebooks could you distribute (and
store) for the bandwidth (and nand space) taken up by downloading the
required dependancies for Java.
A hell of a lot. That's why we need to display prominently exactly how
much space each item in the Journal takes, including
Hi all,
Feel free to ignore my comments here - after all I am not doing any of
the heavy lifting in this field, I just continue to package for Debian
from source, independent on what you come up with here...
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:47:53AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
As a long time Mac
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:47:53AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
On 28 Aug 2009, at 03:58, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Bobby Powers wrote:
I think having something like:
example.activity
|-arch/
|-arch/x86/
|-arch/x86/bin/
|-arch/x86/lib/
|-arch/armel/
...
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:55:37PM +0200, Elena of Valhalla wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Jonas Smedegaardd...@jones.dk wrote:
What would universal be in the Sugar context?
i386 + amd64?
i686 + amd64?
i386 + i686 + amd64?
i386 would work on all of them, even if not optimally, but
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:04:32PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Purposes for 0install(or so) in comparing with native packages:
* one way to install deps in all environments
* non-root install
* requires reliable internet access at install time
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist
Hi Benjamin,
On 28 Aug 2009, at 03:58, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Bobby Powers wrote:
I think having something like:
example.activity
|-arch/
|-arch/x86/
|-arch/x86/bin/
|-arch/x86/lib/
|-arch/armel/
...
could work. Sugar could set an environmental variable ARCH to the
relevant
Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
On 28 Aug 2009, at 03:58, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Bobby Powers wrote:
I think having something like:
example.activity
|-arch/
|-arch/x86/
|-arch/x86/bin/
|-arch/x86/lib/
|-arch/armel/
...
could work. Sugar could set an environmental variable
13 matches
Mail list logo
