I made some change to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Advanced_Topics#Sweets_Distribution
This section is linked from the Ubuntu page.
I think it is slightly more clear now.
I do not why the section title was used for the maybe most important
link. This confused me at least.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:09:22PM +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
I made some change to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Advanced_Topics#Sweets_Distribution
This section is linked from the Ubuntu page.
I think it is slightly more clear now.
I do not why the section title was
Excerpts from Edward Mokurai Cherlin's message of 2012-02-27 03:08:42 +0100:
[pulling in debian-olpc-devel where the Debian efforts to package Sugar
are coordinated]
The big picture answer, apart from instructions for non-standard
installations from non-standard repositories, is to work with
I just updated the wiki page with your suggestions:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Ubuntu
Thanks;
Tom Gilliard
On 02/27/2012 12:09 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
I made some change to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Advanced_Topics#Sweets_Distribution
This
I find that the page is even more confusing... Radical changes have
been made by me.
I don't touch the instructions for desktop Ubuntu, though. Because I
need to do testing.
I find that the ubuntu's official repository has multiple version of sucrose
The page changed radically again... It is not edited by me.
I want to ask that is there an easy-to-install package in Trisquel's
official repository? What is it?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:10:52PM +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
The page changed radically again... It is not edited by me.
That was me. I'm testing Ubuntu install of Sugar now.
I want to ask that is there an easy-to-install package in Trisquel's
official repository? What is it?
I don't know of
I don't know of one. Try sucrose-0.90. Trisquel probably won't have a
later version of Sugar than Ubuntu does ... if they did, they would have
pushed the work upstream to Ubuntu and Debian.
Otherwise, use Sweets. Have you tried that yet?
Testing is not very easy for me. I'm an
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:56:03PM +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
I don't know of one. ?Try sucrose-0.90. ?Trisquel probably won't have a
later version of Sugar than Ubuntu does ... if they did, they would have
pushed the work upstream to Ubuntu and Debian.
Otherwise, use Sweets. ?Have you
Hi, all
My main reference is
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Ubuntu , I assume
its accuracy. Please correct me when needed.
The BIG picture I got:
Install Sugar 0.90 is easy, but it is obsolete.
Sugar is 0.94 is recommended, but, how to install it? What to do with
the fancy
On Sun, February 26, 2012 8:49 pm, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Hi, all
My main reference is
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Ubuntu , I assume
its accuracy. Please correct me when needed.
The BIG picture I got:
Install Sugar 0.90 is easy, but it is obsolete.
Sugar is 0.94 is
On 02/26/2012 05:49 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Hi, all
My main reference is
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Ubuntu , I assume
its accuracy. Please correct me when needed.
The BIG picture I got:
Install Sugar 0.90 is easy, but it is obsolete.
Sugar is 0.94 is recommended, but,
Ubuntu sweets-distribution is alsroots port of sugar 0.94 to Ubuntu with
some Dextrose features.
Works well-just copy-paste commands from page into Ubuntu 11.04
gnome-classic terminal
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution#Installation
Tom Gilliard
On
The above link should work. However, how to find the link from my
first link? I think my link would be regarded as kind of portal.
Also, what about Ubuntu other than version 11.04?
--
Ma Xiaojun
SYSU+CUHK
damage3...@gmail.com
___
Sugar-devel
1-) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Advanced_Topics
(Discusses alsroots' Sweets) and has overview.
Real link is here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution
2-)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution
(has
Is that really true? I thought Sweets was stable. If so, I see no
reason why it shouldn't be listed on the Ubuntu page as Ma Xiaojun
suggested.
I suspect the real reason it isn't listed is that nobody thought to put
it there.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:45:00PM -0800, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo
