2009/7/28 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Regardless of what I said, I think your point of increased memory
usage is a valid one and the community should voice its opinions on
this trade off.
My opinion:
- Focusing resources on different technologies like this is a distraction
- It's an
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:23, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/7/28 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Regardless of what I said, I think your point of increased memory
usage is a valid one and the community should voice its opinions on
this trade off.
My opinion:
- Focusing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have lately seen a lot of duplication of effort in Sugar. I think this
is bad. The success of Sugar demands discipline and careful planning from
its developers.
In particular, I am arguing that supporting Qt or Webkit would be a
terrible idea,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:38:41PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
I have lately seen a lot of duplication of effort in Sugar. I think
this is bad. The success of Sugar demands discipline and careful
planning from its developers.
In
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 19:38, Benjamin M.
Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have lately seen a lot of duplication of effort in Sugar. I think this
is bad. The success of Sugar demands discipline and careful planning from
its
On 27 Jul 2009, at 18:38, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have lately seen a lot of duplication of effort in Sugar. I think
this
is bad. The success of Sugar demands discipline and careful
planning from
its developers.
In particular, I
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Benjamin M.
Schwartzbmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have lately seen a lot of duplication of effort in Sugar. I think this
is bad. The success of Sugar demands discipline and careful planning from
its
On 27.07.2009, at 15:24, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Agreed, but the important point here is taking out barriers, even if
they are psychological ones. By aligning yourself in the GNOME or KDE
camp you are getting out the radar of a big part of the free software
community.
Well said. Sugar can only
Hi All.
I think Benjamin got a point when he refers to
''99.99% of all deployed computers running Sugar are XO-1's, and
will soon be XO-1.5's. These are strongly resource-constrained machines,
and they cannot tolerate inefficiency in the use of disk, CPU, or RAM.
Outside of OLPC, we continue to
Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
To be clear, I'm not positively pushing for Qt, but I have invested my
own time so that people that have a value proposition can bring it on
more easily. A feeling I have developed during my work on Sugar is
that people block because think things are
10 matches
Mail list logo
