Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-19 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 17.12.2011, at 11:39, Bernie Innocenti wrote: On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote: I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-17 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote: I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming activity, after all... A

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-16 Thread Samuel Klein
I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming activity, after all... On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Thomas C Gilliard

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Sebastian Silva
Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO El 14/12/11 19:46, Rafael Ortiz escribió: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com mailto:alan...@hotmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer. Gonzalo On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.orgwrote: Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Gary Martin
On 15 Dec 2011, at 17:44, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer. +1 Activities without maintainers seem like a spiral to the bottom of the quality bucket - I'd personally not want to recommend the ASLO site to a teacher

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Samuel Klein
I would find ASLO more useful if it had a Search all feature that allowed people to find * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities * activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be] under a free-software license * links to activities that are freely

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
I would find ASLO more useful if it had a Search all feature that allowed people to find * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities * activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be] under a free-software license * links to activities that are freely

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Gary Martin
On 15 Dec 2011, at 21:55, Samuel Klein s...@laptop.org wrote: * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities This one is quite a tough one, activities are distributed across a seemingly grey continuum, from non-responding authors, to authors who release in time with the Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
I tried to do this in : http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Soas_V4/ASLOxo_Activity_Test_Table#Activity_Test_Results The criteria are listed at the top of the page. This is a table matrix on the wiki in a sortable and editable form. It is also unmaintained since Nov 2010...: ( Thus newer

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 15/12/11 18:24, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn escribió: I would find ASLO more useful if it had a Search all feature that allowed people to find * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities * activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be] under a

[Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
Hi, Scratch there are in: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249 But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/ Was removed for a discussion about his License.. There are some activities that not are in ASLO.. For example, all the activities that was in:

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, Scratch there are in: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249 But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/ Was removed for a discussion about his License.. There

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, Scratch there are in: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249 But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/ Was removed for a discussion about his License.. Yes.

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity Ok. The importants are in ASLO.. maybe

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here: