2013/5/15 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
Shall we schedule something? What would be a good time to do this? I'm
pretty flexible.
What about same day and hour of previous html meeting? Monday 20 May
2013 - 14:00 UTC
--
.. manuq ..
___
Monday is not ideal for me, but unless someone comes up with another
date/time, let's do it.
-walter
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/5/15 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
Shall we schedule something? What would be a good time to do this? I'm
Shall we schedule something? What would be a good time to do this? I'm
pretty flexible.
-walter
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 6:32 PM, William Orr w...@worrbase.com wrote:
I can definitely help triage whenever you have this next meeting,
depending on when it is.
Daniel Narvaez
I agree with the need of cleanup the bug database. I have proposed that
several times,
and closed many bugs. One of the best arguments I read about this topic,
is the bug bankrupcy description:
*The bug database* is obviously a great thing to have. Bug reports should
be complete, accurate, and
Ah! Thanks for posting this, I knew Joel had something like this but I
couldn't find it anymore.
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I agree with the need of cleanup the bug database. I have proposed that
several times,
and closed many bugs. One of the best arguments I read about
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013, Walter Bender wrote:
I think what would really help, independent of where/how we host
On Sunday, 12 May 2013, William Orr wrote:
Simon Schampijer mailto:si...@schampijer.de
May 11, 2013 11:55 AM
Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Draked...@laptop.org:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaezdwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
There seem to be consensus about keeping to use trac, so I went ahead and
disabled all the github issue trackers.
On Saturday, 11 May 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I noticed people have started to report issues on github.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27
We
Hello,
I noticed people have started to report issues on github.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27
We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so
turn the issue tracker on github off.
Last time we discussed it, the idea was to keep using trac
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27
We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so
turn the issue tracker on github off.
Last time we discussed it, the idea was to
Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27
We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so
turn the issue
Simon Schampijer mailto:si...@schampijer.de
May 11, 2013 11:55 AM
Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Draked...@laptop.org:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaezdwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27
We should probably decide if we
12 matches
Mail list logo
