Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-07 Thread Jake Scarlet
t; From: Jake Scarlet >> To: James Cameron >> Cc: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project >> Message-ID: >> < >> calj6_ukt-ot7r4qnm6u_ldoitx-gfdjr9t0yh7j89qv0gzv...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: te

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-07 Thread Lionel Laské
. Lionel. Le sam. 6 avr. 2019 à 10:48, a écrit : > > Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:34:56 +0530 > From: Jake Scarlet > To: James Cameron > Cc: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project > Message-ID: &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-06 Thread Jake Scarlet
I tested the API from Speak activity. It's fine but I personally found https://github.com/Hagsten/Talkify to be a better option. I could also tweak the voice a bit to make it sound like Alice from the Python version of write, I've looked into the licencing and all. So should I use this or the one

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-05 Thread James Cameron
Look for any APIs used now in Sugarizer for text to speech, and use the same? On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:59:50AM +1400, Jake Scarlet wrote: > Ah yes James, that's exactly what I meant to ask. Thank you all for your > feedback. > The project idea mentions that We can use an existing API based text

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-05 Thread Jake Scarlet
Ah yes James, that's exactly what I meant to ask. Thank you all for your feedback. The project idea mentions that We can use an existing API based text editor for the base. I've decided to go with QuillJS (one of the mentioned options), mainly for the flexibility and the fact that It can be

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-04 Thread James Cameron
Thanks Alex. Write activity is based on AbiWord, and already has built-in spell check feature. I had guessed Jake was asking about a JavaScript module, as part of the [Write activity for Sugarizer] idea.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-04 Thread Alex Perez
Jake, I would personally like to encourage you to not re-implement the wheel. Aspell has been around for a long time, quite possibly longer than you've been alive, and has python bindings, and a C API: See https://pypi.org/project/aspell-python-py3/ and

[Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

2019-04-04 Thread Jake Scarlet
Would it be preferable if I used an existing library for the spellcheck feature or if I created one by myself ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel