Re: [Sugar-devel] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:30:00AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Now here's a mess of ideas from which these three basic intuitions originate: 1. It would be nice to be able to generate various views of what the user can do with shell globs rather than by writing complicated queries over

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-11 Thread C. Scott Ananian
Quick comment: you should probably be thinking about running activities *in place from their ZIP file* rather than storing the unpacked form in the Journal. This will lead to a much simpler implementation in the short term, since activities still have a single identity. There are a number of

[Sugar-devel] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-09 Thread Michael Stone
Wade, Here are a couple of /very/ quick thoughts for you. Please let me know which ones are helpful and which are simply confusing (or misguided). Michael The basic premises of this rant are that we need to be able to mix, match and dissect activities so therefore

[Sugar-devel] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
If I understand Wade correctly the one of the main purposes(at least) is not hiding content bundles somewhere(for example in Browse's bookmarks) ..and I see your concern(for what reason we should create new entities if there are lots of existed content - Gutenberg's texts, pdfs, etc) ..I was