On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:39 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Iain, Sean, Sam,
_Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
Thanks, Gonzalo, is good advice.
My apologies to the other contributors, Sam, Walter and Sean for
clouding their perfectly useful work.
The text that I have
Gustavo,
Are they two instances of the same activity or two different activities? Is
the communication synchronous or asynchronous?
-walter
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Gustavo Duarte gus.dua...@gmail.com
wrote:
James,
I should be more specific, sorry, in my case, the two Activities are
James,
I should be more specific, sorry, in my case, the two Activities are
on the same computer.
Sam,
Are a thread about this, already ?
Thanks.
Gustavo
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi James,
Is this meant to be a reply to an existing thread?
Hi, Sam
As part of GSOC, I am mentoring the Interactive Javascript Project and
have four candidates for the unfunded Web Confusion project who have
volunteered to continue in support of the community. Since the two
projects are closely related and since there are five people involved
plus
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter - here is Iain's document:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20150519/bdaf00ca/attachment.html
Can we have pure plain text, the web team deals with formatting.
I need to be able to provide it in
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Iain Brown Douglas
i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 19:57 +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
Gonzalo - Iain had already consolidated all changes
... almost consolidated!
Chat does not really fit in Multimedia, IMHO.
It's not in Multimedia, it's
Hi James,
Is this meant to be a reply to an existing thread?
Thanks,
Sam
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Are the two activities on:
- separate computers, or
- the same computer?
If the two activities are on separate computers, do they have the same
Hi All,
We're in the last stretch so we're now down to critical fixes. Please
test and let me know ASAP.
Peter
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_RC1/Images/armhfp/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-22-1-sda.raw.xz
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 11:39 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Iain, Sean, Sam,
_Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
Thanks, Gonzalo, is good advice.
I've just spent two hours manually
Walter,
There are two different activities, and the communication could be asynchronous.
I not sure, if the the comment bellow, can confuse you, if yes,
please forget that.
The process who send the message, could be just a script, isn't
needed it be an Activity.
Thanks.
On Wed, May 20,
Hi Gustavo,
I think would help if you explain the specific use case.
The activity who will receive the message is a specific activity,
and you will send it from a script or service?
Can the activity just monitor a file or something like that?
Gonzalo
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Gustavo
Good work!
I forwarded to iaep mailing list.
Gonzalo
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:51 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT
gr...@fundacionzt.org wrote:
2015-05-19 14:35 GMT-06:00 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com:
Many thanks German!
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:25 PM, German Ruiz -
Thanks Peter, I was watching that too.
If I understand correctly switching/changing the sections or adding an
Activity is beyond tweaks? while text changes are tweaks.
I'm quite happy with it, even though there are lots of changes we suggested
which aren't in.
I feel the only tweak still to
Welcome VIbhor,
Use this mailing list to ask any technical question
I don't know if you already have a working Sugar environment,
but you can found more information in developer.sugarlabs.org
Gonzalo
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
It is
_Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
Thanks, Gonzalo, is good advice.
I've just spent two hours manually providing updates. It will be live
on staging shortly.
Please provide any further updates against that.
Right the new updated content is live on staging. Please
Hi Gonzalo,
Sure, I'll try explain the user case.
Notificator: There is a Sugar Activity who shows Notification messages
for the kid.
Daemon: There is an script running on cron, who get new notification
from a Server.
I need communicate the Daemon with the Notificator, so when Daemon
receive a
The notificator can write the notification to a file,
and the activity can use Gio.FileMonitor to know when the file was updated.
Just for curiosity, why not use the Sugar notifications?
Gonzalo
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Gustavo Duarte gus.dua...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Gonzalo,
Sure,
Thanks Gonzalo.
Because, the kind of messages to showing are html.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
The notificator can write the notification to a file,
and the activity can use Gio.FileMonitor to know when the file was updated.
Just for
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4032
Sugar Platform:
0.98 - 0.104
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/29112/image_viewer-62.xo
Release notes:
Use object chooser with preview if available
Restart a instance without a file should show the
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:43:23AM -0300, Gustavo Duarte wrote:
Notificator: There is a Sugar Activity who shows Notification messages
for the kid.
Daemon: There is an script running on cron, who get new notification
from a Server.
I need communicate the Daemon with the Notificator, so
With SOAS Fedora 22 coming to the stage of final release I would like to know
if we can expect the collaboative features of Sugar to be functioning.
I tried Memorize, Maze and Write with two SOAS and it did not work. Have
reported this issue before.
Cheers
---
T.K. Kang
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:10:38PM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote:
Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or
with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)?
Do the two SOAS share a network?
Did previous SOAS work okay?
Is
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:11:45AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote:
Okay, and please bear with me; I don't have the data quota to download
SOAS images; but is the Server entry box in the Collaboration section
of the Network panel of the My Settings set or is it blank?
It has the
I tested the 2 SOAS-22 via a connection to the schoolserver AP. Collaboration
works normally between XOs-1 running 13.2.4.
In Adhoc network connection I could not see the other person in neighbourhood
view.
I think collaboration work on SOAS-17 and below as I alway try to see if the
SOAS
Hi,
My name is Utkarsh Dhawan,I am a Second Year Engineering student at Mumbai
University.I am new to the open source community but have started
developing a keen interest in it.I want to contribute to this community
with a soul purpose of learning something out of it.This summer I would be
This keeps coming up.
I believe that due to changes in telepathy, collaboration (at least for
Jabber) has not worked for the past few Fedora releases.
Given collaboration is supposed to be one of the core features of Sugar,
this makes it hard to promote.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:36 AM, James
Is this registered to the schoolserver? Or only connected to the AP?
Only connected to the Schoolserver via the AP without registration.
Did you see the person in neighbourhood view while using the AP?
Yes they showed up together with any other activities shared by the XO. Could
join by the
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:10:17AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote:
I tested the 2 SOAS-22 via a connection to the schoolserver AP.
Is this registered to the schoolserver? Or only connected to the AP?
In Adhoc network connection I could not see the other person in
neighbourhood view.
Okay, and please bear with me; I don't have the data quota to download
SOAS images; but is the Server entry box in the Collaboration section
of the Network panel of the My Settings set or is it blank?
It has the jabber.sugalabs.org and I have blank it out first for my testing.
I registered the
Thanks Samuel.
So there is effort needed to port Sugar to the versions of Telepathy
in use in Fedora and whatever other distributions are used.
I'm in favour of that.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:03:38AM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
This keeps coming up.
I believe that due to changes in
Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or
with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)?
Do the two SOAS share a network?
Did previous SOAS work okay?
Is there a ticket number?
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote:
Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or
with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)?
Do the two SOAS share a network?
Did previous SOAS work okay?
Is there a ticket number?
I like the way you fixed the OLPC sugar Ubuntu!
On 5/20/2015 8:10 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote:
Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or
with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)?
Do the two SOAS share a network?
Did previous SOAS work okay?
Is there a ticket number?
I like
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:26:41AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote:
Is this registered to the schoolserver? Or only connected to the AP?
Only connected to the Schoolserver via the AP without registration.
Okay, and please bear with me; I don't have the data quota to download
SOAS
Thanks Samuel.
So there is effort needed to port Sugar to the versions of Telepathy
in use in Fedora and whatever other distributions are used.
I'm in favour of that.
+ 1 hope a SOaS (sos) call will get it back to its core functionality and
uniqueness.
Thank you all for the feedback.
This keeps coming up.
I believe that due to changes in telepathy, collaboration (at least for
Jabber) has not worked for the past few Fedora releases.
Not sure which version but in the past I did have some fun linking up XO-1 and
SOAS for varied shared activities. Reliability was good enough at
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:39:35AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote:
Indeed this will be an issue if we give the release web a new face
and people start trying things out (a few perhaps) in initial
testing.
Actually, no, it won't be an issue, because those people will ignore
the
So if you do not blank it out, but leave it as it is, and allow it to
connect to jabber.sugarlabs.org, everything works fine?
Did my last testing with conection to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Not able to get the
shared activity to show/display to join and test.
So things are really broken :-(
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Peter, I was watching that too.
If I understand correctly switching/changing the sections or adding an
Activity is beyond tweaks? while text changes are tweaks.
We need to stop somewhere and say Yes, this is good
39 matches
Mail list logo
