Happy New Year and Seeing in 2006.

2005-12-31 Thread david . pawley
Happy New Year to you all, may all your dreams come true. Two thousand and six arrived( at mid-night )two to threeseconds later at one end of our living room to the other ! Let me explain My wife and myself haveour own television set each, one either end of the living room. MineI

Seeing in 2006

2005-12-30 Thread Frank King
Dear All, How should a diallist see in 2006? After all, the new year starts at midnight when there is no sun (except in the Antarctic) and, this time, it is new moon too so those who like moon dials (always a disappointment in my experience) will also be out of luck. Well, we do have a Leap

Re: Seeing in 2006

2005-12-30 Thread tony moss
Frank King asked: Clocks controlled by Rugby (U.K.) and Frankfurt (Germany) seem not to resynchronise until two or three hours after the event. Can anyone explain why? I'm afraid I can't explain why this is so but it is worthwile mentioning a sundialling relevance. Some years ago, with my

Re: Seeing in 2006

2005-12-30 Thread Patrick Powers
Message text written by tony moss It is a terrible thing to be 'timeless' on such occasions!. Indeed so. My best discovery when similarly inconvenienced (it was my watch that I thought I had calibrated before setting off - but hadn't) here is to use the speaking clock via one's mobile phone.

Re: Seeing in 2006

2005-12-30 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Frank: The radio controlled clocks may not always be listening for the time code, but rather may only listen once per hour. The received signal may be so weak at some times of day that the clock can not get a lock. The U.S. WWVB signal has a couple of bits for leap seconds and a smart