Re: refraction

1998-06-17 Thread Arthur Carlson
Thanks for the graph, Luke. If I take +/- 20 sec as the accuracy of a very good sundial, then I see that I have to start correcting for refraction around 10 deg altitude, i.e., the first hour after sunrise and the last hour before sunset. Since Pete Swanstrom's earliest observation is at 7:10

Re: anybody use raytracing

1998-06-17 Thread Daniel Roth
There are free raytracing packages available that allow you to describe a 3-dimensional object and render an image of it with light sources placed at will. Has anybody used these to simulate sundials? Seems like it should work. Yes, I tried it with POVRAY. I defined a stone and a long

Re: anybody use raytracing

1998-06-17 Thread Daniel Roth
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Doyle J. Groves wrote: Sounds interesting. Could you perhaps make this movie available to the group or at least email me a copy? I've made the files available at http://www.ph-cip.uni-koeln.de/~roth/movie.html As I mentioned they are not what can be done. You'll need

Re: Comments to Annalemic-Equatorial Sundial Page

1998-06-17 Thread Pete Swanstrom
Arthur Carlson wrote: Near sunrise and sunset, atmospheric refraction displaces the image of the sun by about half a degree, which should show up as an error of nearly 1-1/2 min, dial fast at sunrise and slow at sunset. I would be interested in hearing if you can measure this effect. I

1998 sun/polaris dec table

1998-06-17 Thread Richard M. Koolish
The following web page has a table for every day of 1998, giving the declination of the sun, the equation of time, and the declination of Polaris. http://www.cadastral.com/eph1998b.htm