[sup-talk] sup-server revisited

2011-02-21 Thread William Morgan
Hello Sup fans, As I alluded to in an earlier email to sup-devel, I have been working recently on the ancient goal of splitting Sup functionality out into separate client and server programs. This will have many advantages; in particular it will remove email lock-in by making it possible to have

Re: [sup-talk] sup-server

2009-12-19 Thread William Morgan
Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-12-08: I've pushed a branch sup-server to my github*. Very interesting! The approach is quite different from my (perennially unfinished and unpublished) sup-server code so I'm very curious to see where this goes. Nice work. -- William

Re: [sup-talk] sup-server

2009-12-09 Thread Andrei Thorp
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Rich Lane rl...@club.cc.cmu.edu wrote: Excerpts from Andrei Thorp's message of Tue Dec 08 17:12:05 -0500 2009: This really seems like it's in direct competition with the Wave system... but Wave has a lot more support. And yes, Wave doesn't have e-mail federation

[sup-talk] sup-server

2009-12-08 Thread Rich Lane
I've pushed a branch sup-server to my github*. There's a lot to be done before this reaches feature parity with current Sup - for instance, the ncurses client doesn't work yet. *git://github.com/rlane/sup Current status: - Server passes its (incomplete) test suite - sup-cmd executable useful