First, I need to apologize, because I spend too much time talking and
dismissing ideas, and not enough time coding and releasing stuff. The
thing is, coding requires sizeable amounts of uninterrupted time - which
I definitely do not have at the moment and won't until December or so -
while
Script generators are the way I've been leaning.
It's really convenient to have one or more services defined in some kind of
structured data format like yaml or json and to then generate and install the
service scripts.
I wish there was a standard format to define services so the generator
A message was dropped...passing it along as part of the discussion
-- Forwarded message --
From: Casper Ti. Vector caspervec...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: Process Dependency?
To: Avery Payne avery.p.pa...@gmail.com
Sorry, but I just found that I did
Part of the temptation I've been fighting with templates is to write the
grand unified template, that does it all. It sounds horrible and barely
feasible, but the more I poke at it, the more I realize that there is a
specific, constrained set of requirements that could be met in a single
Just curious, but does anyone else have issues seeing some messages on the
mailing list? My last message won't load through the web interface on
skarnet.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Avery Payne avery.p.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
The work on runit-scripts will officially cease December 31,
Le 31/10/2014 21:04, Avery Payne a écrit :
The reason I was attempting to tackle process dependencies is
actually driven by dbus friends. I've stumbled on many modern
processes that need to have A, and possibly B, running before they
launch. Of course, you are right, in the perspective that
