Kamil Cholewiński:
Reaping orphaned children should be the duty of PID 1.
* http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/197472/5132
* http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/177361/5132
There is no objective basis for such a claim, this not actually being a
minimal requirement of process #1. Welcome to the
On 01/30/2017 11:38 AM, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
I would like to ask if runsvdir could by default be defined as a
subreaper on Linux. If it is already a PID 1, then there is no
difference, but sometimes it is not. In that case when an orphan
process happens under it, then it would be re-parented under
