Re: small proxy

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 07:27:09PM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:01 PM, <39066...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> Is there any small proxy that is supervision-friendly? > > > > Polipo is no longer maintained but

Re: small proxy

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > Is there any small proxy that is supervision-friendly? Polipo is no longer maintained but overall quite nice. Good support for pipelining etc.

Re: small proxy

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:01 PM, <39066...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> Is there any small proxy that is supervision-friendly? > > Polipo is no longer maintained but overall quite nice. Good support for > pipelining etc. Well, the author

Re: small proxy

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Laurent Bercot wrote: >> The Polipo author's reasoning may apply to your application as well, my >> memory is essentially the value of HTTP proxies has declined a lot now that >> so much of the web is behind HTTPS. > > > Yes. And if