Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 02:31:52PM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote: > I admit that I am quite bad at quarreling with inherently malicious > people on social networks, and now explicitly request you to help > spreading the post -- Twitter, Medium, your private circle, whatever > suitable -- and

Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 08:25:12PM +0200, fungal-net wrote: > For the first time in 2.5yrs of blogging anti-systemd propaganda ONE > article has 10 time more visits in less than 24hrs than the whole blog > (nearly 300 articles) has for a whole day. So someone is interested. (Somewhat) back to

Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 08:25:12PM +0200, fungal-net wrote: > I wouldn't mind reposting this for you if you had asked me yesterday, or > about 18 hours ago, as I have an older decorated account. Many thanks, but I am afraid the submission would still not have met their high "quality" standard

Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

Casper Ti. Vector: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:37:19PM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote: >> Now I know the reason. "Your account is too young. Please wait >> at least 5 days to begin posting." --- /u/AutoModerator > > Another try: > . > Given the

Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

Another try: . Your efforts are commendable, but r/linux is, like most "general purpose, general audience" fora, a cesspool of ignorance and mediocrity - so the result was predictable. :D (Even if the moderator was well-intentioned, they have

Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:37:19PM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote: > Now I know the reason. "Your account is too young. Please wait > at least 5 days to begin posting." --- /u/AutoModerator Another try: . Given the result, it seems that attempts