Martin "eto" Misuth:
I think Mr Jonathan de Boyne Pollard might be cooking, or even already
has, something similar in nosh.
Long since. (-: It was in version 1.0 .
Martin "eto" Misuth:
at some point I was interested in digging out whether systemd had
"subreapers" at it's disposal, and why
Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
Yet surely there are some user-wide services that don't need DISPLAY
at all, and would be happy to run per-user?
GNOME Terminal isn't one of them. Witness the behaviour of
gnome-terminal-server run as a service if it doesn't have a DISPLAY
environment variable:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 08:33:22 +
> Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
>
> Martin "eto" Misuth:
> > On my presonal box "user level" s6 /services subtrees are in
> > `.config/s6/host`
>
> For comparison: ~/.config/service-bundles/services/ and
>
Martin "eto" Misuth:
I personally am not so "hot" about this listening socket passing stuffs.
When you've had to deal with tens if not hundreds of different ways of
saying "listen on this IP address and port", you'll come around to the
idea of having a single tool that does this one job
Jonathan, since you have implemented that mechanism, could you please
shed some light on the goal of subreapers? What is the point? Your post
in the stackexchange forum talks about the history and the mechanism of
subreapers, but remains silent on why we should have that functionality
in the
Martin "eto" Misuth:
On my presonal box "user level" s6 /services subtrees are in
`.config/s6/host`
For comparison: ~/.config/service-bundles/services/ and
~/.config/service-bundles/targets/
Martin "eto" Misuth:
#!/bin/sh
exec mpd --no-daemon /usr/home/eto/.config/mpd/mpd.conf
Tip: In
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
One of the interesting developments over the past couple of decades is
how much the world has been influenced to come around to the
daemontools way of doing this. I've observed before, elsewhere, the
number of daemon programs, especially in the BSD worlds, that have