[pfSense Support] tx underrun message

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
Hi all, I found these warning messages in the logs. How serious is it? Is the PCI bus or the card (3Com) is too slow? May 3 15:54:53 kernel: xl3: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes May 3 15:54:53 kernel: xl3: transmission error: 90 Best regards Imre -- This is

RE: [pfSense Support] Blocking outbound SMTP

2006-05-04 Thread Robert Mortimer
Robert Mortimer wrote: On 4/29/06, sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does the rule you made look like? You should have the destination port as 25 and source port as * First rule (LAN) BLOCK TCP ! MailServers 25 (SMTP) * * * This is exactly the opposite as what was suggested

[pfSense Support] Site to Site VPN

2006-05-04 Thread Wesley K. Joyce
This is probably basic stuff, but I have never setup a site to site VPN. Is it possible to create a Site to Site VPN tunnel using pfsense and also supports routing so that it will send packets through the VPN if the destination is at the other site, or to the default gateway if the

Re: [pfSense Support] Port Forwarding

2006-05-04 Thread Angelo Turetta
Robert Mortimer wrote: I have a set of 6 public IP addresses I set up pfSense with an internal IP in the 10.0.0.x range and use an external IP All is good except I can not port forward to my mailserver or webserver. I have been to the Firewall: NAT: Port Forward tab and set up the port forward

[pfSense Support] Voip shapping rules

2006-05-04 Thread Guilherme Oliveira
Hi ! One question: If I have the Voip gateway in the DMZ, the Out Interface must be DMZ or Wan ? I have DMZ but I still can't visualy see any traffic in status queues. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
Hi, I'm testing the pfSense CARP configuration on version BETA3-PLUS-11548-PLUS-11567. Everything seems working fine exept that both machines in the carp cluster is master. It's like the preemption weren't enabled. In this version this option is missing in GUI setup and supposed to be set by

Re: [pfSense Support] small fast smtp relay

2006-05-04 Thread Jeroen
On 5/4/06, Mailling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How did you install postfix on a Pfsense machine? pkg_add -r postfix ? -- Jeroen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [pfSense Support] Site to Site VPN

2006-05-04 Thread Holger Bauer
You need parallel tunnels for this to work. unfortunately routing across a tunnel doesn't work (yet). Example: LAN1---pfSense1-(Internet)-pfSense2---LAN2---ROUTER--LAN3 You have to use different identifiers at both ends for the tunnels as both tunnels are

Re: [pfSense Support] small fast smtp relay

2006-05-04 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Jeroen wrote: On 5/4/06, Mailling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How did you install postfix on a Pfsense machine? pkg_add -r postfix ? But not on the embedded image, right? -- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org

RE: [pfSense Support] Voip shapping rules

2006-05-04 Thread Holger Bauer
Atm pfSense only supports trafficshaping between 2 interfaces. If your pfSense as 3 interfaces (WAN/LAN/DMZ) and you have set up traffic shaping between LAN and WAN by running the wizard your DMZ won't be shaped. This is kind of a limitation of the frontend atm but this won't change for pfSense

Re: [pfSense Support] Site to Site VPN

2006-05-04 Thread Guilherme Oliveira
Need someone confirmation but I think you can do it with ipsec. On 5/4/06, Wesley K. Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably basic stuff, but I have never setup a site to site VPN. Is it possible to create a Site to Site VPN tunnel using pfsense and also supports routing so that it

[pfSense Support] Firewall Problem

2006-05-04 Thread Trevor J. Burt
Dear Support I have installed Beta 3 as a firewall/router WAN is on a p2p address /30 LAN is on a private network for configuration only DMZ is on a /28 Traffic inbound from the WAN to DMZ works fine, However I am unable to connect to the Internet from the DMZ through the

RE: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Holger Bauer
Even with preemption disabled you should not have 2 masters. A disabled preemption only means you more or less have a randomly chosen master and another node will become master only if the original master fails. You get some information on how CARP is set up when running ifconfig. Holger

RE: [pfSense Support] small fast smtp relay

2006-05-04 Thread Holger Bauer
You can set the filesystem read-write by running: /etc/rc.conf_mount_rw /etc/rc.conf_mount_ro and the system will set it to read-only again sooner or later if making changes. But beware! You are walking in a minefield and this is unsopported ;-) Holger -Original Message- From: Eugen

[pfSense Support] Problems continue

2006-05-04 Thread Derrick MacPherson
I've been having several ongoing problems; passive FTP into the DMZ, logging of pass packets yet I have no logging turned on, and the latest is routing from my internal SMTP server to the external SMTP server. The latest just stopped working for about an hour yesterday, the mail server when

RE: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Ebay
Title: RE: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption Are you using a dedicated interface for CARP sync? -Original Message- From: Ispanovits Imre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:15 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption Hi,

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
On Thu, 4 May 2006 07:54:27 -0500 Ebay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you using a dedicated interface for CARP sync? Yes of course. -- Skype: ispanovits_imre This is Linux Land. In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
Check the archives, others have had this problem and it ended up being connectivity issues from a switch. On 5/4/06, Ispánovits Imre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006 15:10:16 +0200 Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even with preemption disabled you should not have 2 masters. A

Re: [pfSense Support] tx underrun message

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
On Thu, 04 May 2006 10:51:08 -0400 Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ispánovits Imre wrote: Hi all, I found these warning messages in the logs. How serious is it? Is the PCI bus or the card (3Com) is too slow? May 3 15:54:53 kernel: xl3: tx underrun, increasing tx start

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Peter Curran
I can confirm Scott's words - I was one of the people with the problem. My results where exactly the same as you are seeing (except mine was only on one interface). Carp multicasts stuff on the interface at regualr intervals and expects to see multicasts from the other system coming in. It is

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
On Thu, 4 May 2006 18:55:13 +0100 Peter Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can confirm Scott's words - I was one of the people with the problem. My results where exactly the same as you are seeing (except mine was only on one interface). Carp multicasts stuff on the interface at regualr

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Rainer Duffner
Ispánovits Imre wrote: In my case there is no switch between the two CARP boxes, but a Xover cable. But I can suspect the cards, which are old 3Com ISA bus cards That's probably why it's called the road to dISAster Rainer

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
On Thu, 04 May 2006 21:07:48 +0200 Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ispánovits Imre wrote: In my case there is no switch between the two CARP boxes, but a Xover cable. But I can suspect the cards, which are old 3Com ISA bus cards That's probably why it's called the road

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
Have you added allow all rules on the pfsync interfaces? On 5/4/06, Ispánovits Imre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 04 May 2006 21:07:48 +0200 Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ispánovits Imre wrote: In my case there is no switch between the two CARP boxes, but a Xover cable. But

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense L7 filtering

2006-05-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 5/4/06, Pedro Paulo de Magalhaes Oliveira Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm thinking about developing an IPS to pfsense. Does anybody knows how to kill tcp connection or udp connection in pf based in string match? Don't think this is possible. You can use pfctl to kill a single

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Ispánovits Imre
On Thu, 4 May 2006 15:46:12 -0400 Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you added allow all rules on the pfsync interfaces? Yes, I did. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP preemption

2006-05-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 5/4/06, Ispánovits Imre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 4 May 2006 15:46:12 -0400 Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you added allow all rules on the pfsync interfaces? Yes, I did. What about the switch where both the wan and lan interfaces plug into? They also need to be able

[pfSense Support] Squid and policy based dual wan

2006-05-04 Thread Christian Gerlitz
Title: Nachricht Hello, Iam looking for a quick and dirty solution for the above. I give it up to try to internaly forward the http traffic to another pfsense box. So I set up one pfsense withone PPPoE adsl connection directly connected to this box as WANand one PPPoE connection over a

[pfSense Support] Interviewed on BSD Talk podcast, check it out!

2006-05-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2006/05/bsdtalk039-interview-with-bsd.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[pfSense Support] pfsense Beta4 availability?

2006-05-04 Thread rabbtux rabbtux
Scott, Looking forward to your WRAP watchdog tweaks, any idea when to see beta4? Listened to your interview today, great job! Thanks - marshall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: